Has Kim Perks' email not formed part of any defence submission? It seems highly pertinent to the current judicial review.
No, Roch...
But I agree, the reply that I got from Kim Perks is pertinent to the silencer issue - Essex police admitting to the existence of at least two different sound moderators at the heart of their investigations, information that's known about at the time of Jeremy Bambers trial by both the prosecution and the defence advocates - can't understand why the jury were not permitted to know about this remarkable piece of evidence (since, the jury were selected from members of the public, who Essex police make it clear that such information was not for disclosure publicly)
Great, finally understanding what really goes on behind the scenes!
I guess then, that I might be a witness (along with Kim Perks and the force solicitor of the era)?
If so, though, I will have to declare that Jeremy confided in me, that he was involved in the killing of the other four victims, which will in turn result in the Home Office having to produce the tape records of Jeremy's confession together with the photograph they seized showing Sheila on top of her parents bed sporting only one bullet entry wound to her neck, and the accompanying letter I sent along with it to Jeremy, which as I have confirmed was subsequently confiscated by prison authorities. Additionally, I do know that at the time this happened, that all telephone calls made by inmates to a member of the public were listened in on, and automatically recorded at HMP Full Sutton by prison security!
It's going to be interesting, should all this evidence go before the court of appeal...
If so, the appeal should be dealt with by the current Lord Chief Justice, because any lesser ranked appellant judge, could dismiss the significance of this, and any other relevant fresh evidence!
