Evasive?

[Caroline]

Every response from supporters -to detractors' experiences- is about alternative possibilities. Excuses? ie He might have................well, yes, he MIGHT................but there still -always- remains the probability that he DID.

Exactly, why ask the question in the first place?

[Roch]

Not sure why you asked the question if you didn't want the answer or that you would decide to answer for him.

That's not Not Sure. It's Jan 

[David1819]

The letters were once posted on here, but soon taken down. This so called evasiveness was exposed as a gross misrepresentation long ago.

Here is the alleged smoking gun -


"22/4/13         JEREMY BAMBER
                         A5352AC
                         HM FULL SUTTON
                         YORK
                         YO411PS

DEAR CAROLINE
I THOUGHT THAT ID ANSWERED
YOUR LAST LETTER, BUT MAY
BE NOT - I GET A BIT
MUDDLED SOMETIMES AS
I GET LOADS OF MAIL WHEN
THAT SKY TV PROGS ON AND
I DON'T KNOW QUITE WHAT
I'M DOING. I KNOW YOU
ASKED ME A PARTICULAR
QUESTION - I CANT RECALL
WHAT IT WAS NOW - I KNOW
THE ANSWER WAS NO OR
ITS NOT TRUE."

[Jane]

That's not Not Sure. It's Jan 

Groaaan

[Kaldin]

Any examples of Jeremy being evasive then? I think that Carol Lee also said something along those lines.

[Kaldin]

They already have, but you're choosing to ignore it.

No they haven't, and your mate trolled the thread. l

If he was evasive, I think it was because people asked him personal stuff and he knew that they would probably put his letters all over the internet or in a book, so he didn't want to address the questions.

[Jane]

No they haven't, and your mate trolled the thread. l

If he was evasive, I think it was because people asked him personal stuff and he knew that they would probably put his letters all over the internet or in a book, so he didn't want to address the questions.

None of which means, IF you're correct, that he wasn't evasive. THAT was the claim, NOT why that might have been. The reasons for which may be legion.

[Kaldin]

Are we all agreed then that being evasive in a letter isn't a sign of guilt?

[David1819]

Are we all agreed then that being evasive in a letter isn't a sign of guilt?

Depends how much crack the recipient has smoked.

[Kaldin]

Depends how much crack the recipient has smoked.

 

[Kaldin]

I think sami is being evasive ...   

[sami]

 

[Jan]

Are we all agreed then that being evasive in a letter isn't a sign of guilt?

There are quite a lot of his letters being shown on social media at the moment . Not sure how I feel about that , but I guess it’s a risk he takes when he writes to people . But I did not see any evasive ones .

[Caroline]

There are quite a lot of his letters being shown on social media at the moment . Not sure how I feel about that , but I guess it’s a risk he takes when he writes to people . But I did not see any evasive ones .

How do you know what questions were asked and ignored?

[David1819]

No I didn't. I was hoping for a decent discussion, but sami trolled the thread and got nasty, so now I can't be bothered.

You obviously didn’t realise that these “evasive” letters are widely seen as a joke. They tell us nothing about the sender, but a lot about the recipient.