Evasive?

[Kaldin]

I've read about some people who say they used to write to Jeremy and receive letters from him, but they said that he became evasive at certain questions, and that led them to be suspicious or it convinced them that he was guilty.

What kind of thing are they talking about? Is it stuff like - how he thought the silencer got blood on it, or how it ended up in the gun cupboard?

Is it personal stuff about his life or his feelings?

If it's the latter, isn't it natural that he would be evasive? After all, several of his letters have turned up in public, so those who received them obviously don't think they should be private.

[Roch]

I've read about some people who say they used to write to Jeremy and receive letters from him, but they said that he became evasive at certain questions, and that led them to be suspicious or it convinced them that he was guilty.

What kind of thing are they talking about? Is it stuff like - how he thought the silencer got blood on it, or how it ended up in the gun cupboard?

Is it personal stuff about his life or his feelings?

If it's the latter, isn't it natural that he would be evasive? After all, several of his letters have turned up in public, so those who received them obviously don't think they should be private.

I can think of a few reasons why an innocent Jeremy would be evasive.  You have to try and put your self in his shoes.

If he feels he is pre-empting his legal process.
If he feels the person writing to him is treating him like he's guilty (that would really annoy me, if I knew I was innocent).
If he feels he's had his fingers burned in the past and too much as found its way online.
If he feels he's inadvertently helping the police to prepare a counter argument.

[Jan]

Well some things if he is innocent he simply does not know ?

I wrote to him about the writing that mike claimed was by Sheila as I said before we spent ages trying to decipher what it meant.

He just said , not angrily , it was written by a psychic and mike knew that , and thanked us for our time on trying.

He seemed polite , matter of fact and nothing more than that really .

[David1819]

I've read about some people who say they used to write to Jeremy and receive letters from him, but they said that he became evasive at certain questions, and that led them to be suspicious or it convinced them that he was guilty.

What kind of thing are they talking about? Is it stuff like - how he thought the silencer got blood on it, or how it ended up in the gun cupboard?

Is it personal stuff about his life or his feelings?

If it's the latter, isn't it natural that he would be evasive? After all, several of his letters have turned up in public, so those who received them obviously don't think they should be private.

You won’t get a straight answer. The one making this claim is very evasive about it 

[lookout]

Well some things if he is innocent he simply does not know ?

I wrote to him about the writing that mike claimed was by Sheila as I said before we spent ages trying to decipher what it meant.

He just said , not angrily , it was written by a psychic and mike knew that , and thanked us for our time on trying.

He seemed polite , matter of fact and nothing more than that really .

He's always polite Jan and very grateful that someone bothers to write, or send him cards.

[Caroline]

I've read about some people who say they used to write to Jeremy and receive letters from him, but they said that he became evasive at certain questions, and that led them to be suspicious or it convinced them that he was guilty.

What kind of thing are they talking about? Is it stuff like - how he thought the silencer got blood on it, or how it ended up in the gun cupboard?

Is it personal stuff about his life or his feelings?

If it's the latter, isn't it natural that he would be evasive? After all, several of his letters have turned up in public, so those who received them obviously don't think they should be private.

Never asked about his feelings. Personally, I only asked him about the case.

Why didn't you dial 999?
Did you try to sell pictures of Sheila?
How did you know how much was in your dads wallet?

ETC!

[Caroline]

I can think of a few reasons why an innocent Jeremy would be evasive.  You have to try and put your self in his shoes.

If he feels he is pre-empting his legal process.
If he feels the person writing to him is treating him like he's guilty (that would really annoy me, if I knew I was innocent).
If he feels he's had his fingers burned in the past and too much as found its way online.
If he feels he's inadvertently helping the police to prepare a counter argument.

He's guilty and can't think of an excuse.

[Caroline]

He's always polite Jan and very grateful that someone bothers to write, or send him cards.

I thought Jan wrote to him already?

[Roch]

He's guilty and can't think of an excuse.

My post only related to an innocent Jeremy.

[lookout]

I thought Jan wrote to him already?

I was just acknowledging Jan on how polite he was ?

[Caroline]

My post only related to an innocent Jeremy.

I know but mine wasn't.

[David1819]

The letters were once posted on here, but soon taken down. This so called evasiveness was exposed as a gross misrepresentation long ago.

[Jan]

Never asked about his feelings. Personally, I only asked him about the case.

Why didn't you dial 999?
Did you try to sell pictures of Sheila?
How did you know how much was in your dads wallet?

ETC!

1 was already answered in his statements so why would he say any different
3  I still don’t know why you think this is a pronblem , he was in business with his father , he knew on what days workers would be paid etc . He probably knew when he went to the bank and collected money due to him etc.
2. I only know a version he told an alleged friend of his and it’s been discussed an finetum on here .

[Jane]

1 was already answered in his statements so why would he say any different
3  I still don’t know why you think this is a pronblem , he was in business with his father , he knew on what days workers would be paid etc . He probably knew when he went to the bank and collected money due to him etc.
2. I only know a version he told an alleged friend of his and it’s been discussed an finetum on here .

Every response from supporters -to detractors' experiences- is about alternative possibilities. Excuses? ie He might have................well, yes, he MIGHT................but there still -always- remains the probability that he DID.

[Caroline]

1 was already answered in his statements so why would he say any different
3  I still don’t know why you think this is a pronblem , he was in business with his father , he knew on what days workers would be paid etc . He probably knew when he went to the bank and collected money due to him etc.
2. I only know a version he told an alleged friend of his and it’s been discussed an finetum on here .

Not sure why you asked the question if you didn't want the answer or that you would decide to answer for him.