Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices

[David1819]

On page 3 point 7 of HLMs report. It also mentions the bloodstains on Sheila's arm. What some believe are "28 wounds"

[Roch]

On page 3 point 7 of HLMs report. It also mentions the bloodstains on Sheila's arm. What some believe are "28 wounds"

Who said there were 28 wounds between her wrist and elbow? Did HLM have info pertaining to the PM report? If so, his opinion may have been coloured by it. Do we know exactly which photo 29 is?

[David1819]

Who said there were 28 wounds between her wrist and elbow? Did HLM have info pertaining to the PM report? If so, his opinion may have been coloured by it. Do we know exactly which photo 29 is?

That's what you and Bill have been claiming for last 3 years. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

[Roch]

That's what you and Bill have been claiming for last 3 years. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

I think you are getting confused.

What quality of photos did Jeremy have during the time of HLM's involvement? I suspect he has taken PV at face value and not had access to higher Def blown up images.

[Bill Robertson]

I think you are getting confused.

What quality of photos did Jeremy have during the time of HLM's involvement? I suspect he has taken PV at face value and not had access to higher Def blown up images.

The high resolution images were first examined in 2015. I was told that Jeremy was astonished by the discovery of the numerous wounds to Sheila

[David1819]

The high resolution images were first examined in 2015. I was told that Jeremy was astonished by the discovery of the numerous wounds to Sheila

I'm sure he was "astonished" by the "discovery" of Nevills 999 call also. Just like he buys into some of Mike's ideas also. The guy has been in prison for over 30 years and is very vulnerable to wishful thinking.

[David1819]

I think you are getting confused.

What quality of photos did Jeremy have during the time of HLM's involvement? I suspect he has taken PV at face value and not had access to higher Def blown up images.

I suspect he looked at the photos of the blood and formed his conclusions. That was his expertise.

Everyone can see they are bloodstains and blood runs on Sheila's arm. Except you and Bill.

[Bill Robertson]

The high resolution images were first examined in 2015. I was told that Jeremy was astonished by the discovery of the numerous wounds to Sheila

Jeremy was not allowed to view the high resolution images by the prison authorities because as a Cat A prisoner he is not permitted to see images of weapons. So, even though there were no pictures of the rifle in the high resolution images, because they were derived from a picture that did include the rifle he was not allowed to view them.

[ngb1066]

Jeremy was not allowed to view the high resolution images by the prison authorities because as a Cat A prisoner he is not permitted to see images of weapons. So, even though there were no pictures of the rifle in the high resolution images, because they were derived from a picture that did include the rifle he was not allowed to view them.

I really do not believe that.

[Roch]

I suspect he looked at the photos of the blood and formed his conclusions. That was his expertise.

Everyone can see they are bloodstains and blood runs on Sheila's arm. Except you and Bill.

Re HLM, it's mentioned in Wilkes, across about four pages approximately between 308-312.

The thing is David, it's not just Sheila who had non-disclosed wounds. It's June and Nevill also. And didn't Terezon also complain regarding an originally withheld photo of Nevill's forearm?

What I think should be done by the defence / campaign team is to have nondescript diagrams drawn up of each adult, including Jeremy, with all none-bullet wounds indicated, for comparison. It is clear that there was a life or death struggle that night. Jeremy is unmarked. How would Sheila emerge from such carnage unmarked and without any traces of the other two adults?

[David1819]

Re HLM, it's mentioned in Wilkes, across about four pages approximately between 308-312.

The thing is David, it's not just Sheila who had non-disclosed wounds. It's June and Nevill also. And didn't Terezon also complain regarding an originally withheld photo of Nevill's forearm?

What I think should be done by the defence / campaign team is to have nondescript diagrams drawn up of each adult, including Jeremy, with all none-bullet wounds indicated, for comparison. It is clear that there was a life or death struggle that night. Jeremy is unmarked. How would Sheila emerge from such carnage unmarked and without any traces of the other two adults?

There were no "non-disclosed" wounds. And Terzeon never made such a claim.

[David1819]

How would Sheila emerge from such carnage unmarked and without any traces of the other two adults?

Carniage? She shot two elderly defenceless people. One of whom was still in bed.

[Roch]

Carniage? She shot two elderly defenceless people. One of whom was still in bed.

She shot them using a weapon designed for vermin control. Allegedly. She is supposed to have clubbed Nevill so hard, the stock broke. She is supposed to have mutilated Nevill's corpse. He had numerous bullet wounds, and head injuries and his head bled profusely. Nevill was ex-RAF and farm-fit. Both Grandparents were aware that their Grandchildren were upstairs, in their care, at their home, during their watch.

[guest7363]

I really do not believe that.

Im pleased you’ve commented NGB, I was going to but I thought what’s the point. Now there aren’t any guilty posters posting, the innocent posters are able to post any such crap they want and go unchallenged, I personally think this is what they wanted and  to be honest, there is only David challenging. 

[Roch]

the innocent posters are able to post any such crap they want and go unchallenged, I personally think this is what they wanted and  to be honest, there is only David challenging.

RJ, what crap is David challenging?