Author Topic: Conflicting Statements  (Read 80692 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #660 on: January 01, 2020, 06:28:PM »




So just say he hadn't said anything ? He didn't have to mention all the guns in the farmhouse .


Of course he did! He went out of his way to emphasize Sheila's competency. Possibly another reason they didn't rush to go in.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #661 on: January 01, 2020, 06:29:PM »
or he could have just left everything until he or someone was due in for work and that would have been the first time he knew anything about what happened. surely if he was planning it he would have done that? doesn’t make sense to say his dad called. or are we assuming he would have been the first to arrive on scene and that would have immediately brought suspicion onto him. although i don’t see how as they never found the clothes he was wearing etc so the evidence would t have been there

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #662 on: January 01, 2020, 06:30:PM »
or he could have just left everything until he or someone was due in for work and that would have been the first time he knew anything about what happened. surely if he was planning it he would have done that? doesn’t make sense to say his dad called. or are we assuming he would have been the first to arrive on scene and that would have immediately brought suspicion onto him. although i don’t see how as they never found the clothes he was wearing etc so the evidence would t have been there

Exactly. He didn't really need an "alibi" because it appeared that Sheila had shot everyone and then shot herself.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #663 on: January 01, 2020, 06:31:PM »
or he could have just left everything until he or someone was due in for work and that would have been the first time he knew anything about what happened. surely if he was planning it he would have done that? doesn’t make sense to say his dad called. or are we assuming he would have been the first to arrive on scene and that would have immediately brought suspicion onto him. although i don’t see how as they never found the clothes he was wearing etc so the evidence would t have been there

He used the phone call as an alibi and that he was outside with the police when Sheila died - no one heard any shot from the bedroom even though the window was open. The farm had a burn pit, he burned his parents clothes in it, it's likely he burned his own in it too.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #664 on: January 01, 2020, 06:35:PM »
He used the phone call as an alibi and that he was outside with the police when Sheila died - no one heard any shot from the bedroom even though the window was open. The farm had a burn pit, he burned his parents clothes in it, it's likely he burned his own in it too.

oh i see you’re saying it was his alibi , was he always first at work so we know? , if it was so we’ll planned you’d think he’d have waited until he knew someone else was going to be there first then

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #665 on: January 01, 2020, 06:38:PM »
He used the phone call as an alibi and that he was outside with the police when Sheila died - no one heard any shot from the bedroom even though the window was open. The farm had a burn pit, he burned his parents clothes in it, it's likely he burned his own in it too.


They took samples from the pit so I think they would have spotted his clothes in there . It was a slow burning pit not a raging bonfire .

I never said the call was not his alibi , but why did he not just phone 999 at a time that suited him?

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #666 on: January 01, 2020, 06:41:PM »
He used the phone call as an alibi and that he was outside with the police when Sheila died - no one heard any shot from the bedroom even though the window was open. The farm had a burn pit, he burned his parents clothes in it, it's likely he burned his own in it too.


Just to be clear on this . When are you saying this happened ? I have not heard this theory before ? And what is your evidence for this particular accusation? Because it fits that no clothes or foot wear used in the crime were ever found ? By man or beast ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #667 on: January 01, 2020, 06:43:PM »

They took samples from the pit so I think they would have spotted his clothes in there . It was a slow burning pit not a raging bonfire .

I never said the call was not his alibi , but why did he not just phone 999 at a time that suited him?

He only had to mix his clothes in with his parents - he heat would destroy any evidence. I have already answered your 999 point ....

A 999 call would have had police there before him, he couldn't influence anyone if he wasn't there. But I think he made a mistake when he didn't call 999. The fact that he made mistakes doesn't exonerate him.

To add, they may have even entered and found the bodies had been dead longer than Bamber was suggesting. I can only speculate of course.

Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #668 on: January 01, 2020, 06:45:PM »

Just to be clear on this . When are you saying this happened ? I have not heard this theory before ? And what is your evidence for this particular accusation? Because it fits that no clothes or foot wear used in the crime were ever found ? By man or beast ?

When he burned his parents clothes. Why would you hear the theory before? That's how 'I' think he got rid of whatever it is he needed to get rid of, IF he needed to get rid of anything.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #669 on: January 01, 2020, 06:46:PM »
Where is the statement which says he burnt his parents' clothes? When did he do that?

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #670 on: January 01, 2020, 06:48:PM »
He only had to mix his clothes in with his parents - he heat would destroy any evidence. I have already answered your 999 point ....

To add, they may have even entered and found the bodies had been dead longer than Bamber was suggesting. I can only speculate of course.



Gosh that is very intelligent planning . But apparently he was capable of driving a lot faster than he did and I am not sure he would have totally anticipated thier reaction . And was it not the police who told him to wait for them hence why he wanted them to arrive first ? It’s all so confusing. But sorry we will have to agree to disagree that your theory makes sense .

Time of arrival versus looking like an idiot .

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #671 on: January 01, 2020, 06:50:PM »
When he burned his parents clothes. Why would you hear the theory before? That's how 'I' think he got rid of whatever it is he needed to get rid of, IF he needed to get rid of anything.

Well I have been on here a long time in and off and I had not heard your theory before . Glad to hear it’s just a theory though .

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #672 on: January 01, 2020, 06:53:PM »
Well I have been on here a long time in and off and I had not heard your theory before . Glad to hear it’s just a theory though .


How do you know it's "just a theory" though?

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #673 on: January 01, 2020, 06:57:PM »

How do you know it's "just a theory" though?

It's just your speculation - ie, a theory.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #674 on: January 01, 2020, 07:00:PM »
caroline was in contact with jb at one time what he may have told her ,you and i will never know.so maybe more than just a theory