Conflicting Statements

[guest7363]

Personally I would not want him released on a technicality - not because of fanciful assumptions of what he would do - but because his life would not be worth living on the outside.

It would have to be new evidence that was withheld at the trial .

I agree

[lookout]

But there can't be a new trial after all this time. The likelihood of him being released on a technicality is remote.

JB would never hear of being released on a technicality. In all these 34 years he could easily, and many would have done, admitted guilt and quite possibly released, but because he's not guilty he'd rather stay there until he dies.

Why do you think he's never admitted guilt for a lesser sentence ?

[Jane]

JB would never hear of being released on a technicality. In all these 34 years he could easily, and many would have done, admitted guilt and quite possibly released, but because he's not guilty he'd rather stay there until he dies.

Why do you think he's never admitted guilt for a lesser sentence ?

Coz there'd be no hope of compensation?

[guest7363]

But there can't be a new trial after all this time. The likelihood of him being released on a technicality is remote.

Long way off Steve, I don’t think anything has been submitted yet, at least the CCRC will have a head start if they read here 😂😂😂

[lookout]

Coz there'd be no hope of compensation?

He wouldn't get compensation anyway if he admitted to guilt, so why hasn't he ? He could well have been out before now.

[Caroline]

He wouldn't get compensation anyway if he admitted to guilt, so why hasn't he ? He could well have been out before now.

That's why - plus he'd be lumped with the rest of the child killers. There is no incentive to admit guilt.

[lookout]

That's why - plus he'd be lumped with the rest of the child killers. There is no incentive to admit guilt.

He's already lumped with killers, of sorts---still killers whichever way you look at them. Those who admit guilt do usually get their sentences reduced, or released on condition/licence.

[Caroline]

He's already lumped with killers, of sorts---still killers whichever way you look at them. Those who admit guilt do usually get their sentences reduced, or released on condition/licence.

No compo!

[lookout]

No compo!

I'm fully aware of that.

[Jane]

He's already lumped with killers, of sorts---still killers whichever way you look at them. Those who admit guilt do usually get their sentences reduced, or released on condition/licence.

So does he cling to being innocent which, in all likelihood, will afford him higher status in the prisoners' hierarchy, and earn him some respect, PLUS the chance to get out, eventually and claim compensation, OR does he admit guilt, drop like a stone in the hierarchy system, become just another child killer, and take the retribution for fooling other prisoners, get early release IF he's still alive but with no chance of compensation. I think I know which one I'd go for.

[Jan]

Coz there'd be no hope of compensation?

ah so money above freedom . Of course .

to be honest if he is ever released on appeal I don't think compensation would be granted . because if the case was judged on the facts presented to the court at the time there would be no compensation .

However if there was deliberate withholding of evidence by EP there would be a big payout - but not for years . His income ( like others ) would be from his story .

[Caroline]

ah so money above freedom . Of course .

to be honest if he is ever released on appeal I don't think compensation would be granted . because if the case was judged on the facts presented to the court at the time there would be no compensation .

However if there was deliberate withholding of evidence by EP there would be a big payout - but not for years . His income ( like others ) would be from his story .

It really not something I am considering.

[sami]

He wouldn't get compensation anyway if he admitted to guilt, so why hasn't he ? He could well have been out before now.

not all killers admit their guilt to get out early,whomes and steel come to mind ,the range rover murders in essex.whomes father while dying with cancer asked him to admit to the murders so he could come out and be with his dying father,he refused,because just like jb he knew the evidence wasnt strong  even though the jury convicted them to life in prison in early 1990s

[guest7363]

Just a Question, would you get a different noise or would you be able to tell if someone had put their finger down on the cradle, or placed the phone back down on the cradle?


http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3132.0;attach=38124

Or did Jeremy use the finger excuse to reinforce the fact something bad was happening?

[Caroline]

Just a Question, would you get a different noise or would you be able to tell if someone had put their finger down on the cradle, or placed the phone back down on the cradle?


http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3132.0;attach=38124

Or did Jeremy use the finger excuse to reinforce the fact something bad was happening?

No, it would just click in both instances.