Yes, +1 Rochford.
Much has been made of Sheila not showing evidence of having committed the murders.However,when I really think about it,there certainly IS evidence there.NGB has told us that an semi-atomatic weapon is very easy to use.The lack of gun residue/oil on her skin/nightdress I believe could simply have come down to the fact that she had showered and changed.There was evidence the shower had been used,Sheila appeared to look freshly washed,especially her hair that had seemed to dry without her brushing or styling it,and there were not one,BUT THREE buckets of clothes soaking in the kitchen.Were all these items of clothing being soaked because they were bloodstained?And as Cliff mentioned,why did Jones take away two pairs of shoes from Sheilas bedroom,and what happened to them?Jones had a particular interest in Sheilas clothes too!Why would this be if he indeed suspected Jeremy?