Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber trial examination  (Read 16994 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #150 on: November 17, 2019, 02:22:PM »
It wasn't up to Nevill to give full control, and he couldn't control what Sheila did in her own home. Full control means full custody.

He wasn't asking Nevil's permission, he was telling him. Full control doesn't mean custody, custody means custody. Until someone posts something to prove he was going for full custody, then it remains hearsay and open to interpretation.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #151 on: November 17, 2019, 02:24:PM »
He wasn't asking Nevil's permission, he was telling him. Full control doesn't mean custody, custody means custody. Until someone posts something to prove he was going for full custody, then it remains hearsay and open to interpretation.

He didn't need to tell Nevill, he needed to tell Sheila. Nevill was nothing to do with the twins, other than being their grandfather. I didn't say he was going for full custody, I said that he wanted full custody.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #152 on: November 17, 2019, 02:26:PM »
He didn't need to tell Nevill, he needed to tell Sheila. Nevill was nothing to do with the twins, other than being their grandfather. I didn't say he was going for full custody, I said that he wanted full custody.

I don't agree and he was telling Nevil as part of a letter that that included things about June. If he meant custody, he's have said so.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #153 on: November 17, 2019, 02:54:PM »
Hadn't June been scurrying around looking for someone to look after the twins whilst they were at WHF ?
Nevill was working the fields and busy, June obviously didn't feel up to it as she also had Sheila who needed looking after as Sheila had proved incapable.
There would have been a meeting among women as was planned during Pam's phonecall which included Betty Howie ? Sadly nothing came to fruition.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #154 on: November 17, 2019, 03:04:PM »
Hadn't June been scurrying around looking for someone to look after the twins whilst they were at WHF ?
Nevill was working the fields and busy, June obviously didn't feel up to it as she also had Sheila who needed looking after as Sheila had proved incapable.
There would have been a meeting among women as was planned during Pam's phonecall which included Betty Howie ? Sadly nothing came to fruition.


I thought the call was to arrange for June and Sheila to visit Pam for lunch? I don't recall Pam saying anything about childcare or Betty Howie.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #155 on: November 17, 2019, 03:47:PM »

I thought the call was to arrange for June and Sheila to visit Pam for lunch? I don't recall Pam saying anything about childcare or Betty Howie.





It was June who'd said to Pam that she wants to talk about Sheila as she was worried about her condition.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #156 on: November 17, 2019, 08:26:PM »
He would if he thought they were neglected. The boys were his priority.
But he had control over them on weekdays. The twins cherished the weekend visits with their mother.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #157 on: November 17, 2019, 08:32:PM »
But he had control over them on weekdays. The twins cherished the weekend visits with their mother.

That's not really the point is it? Sheila was unstable, he didn't want her making any decisions about the twins. He wanted to have 100% say in how they were brought up.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #158 on: November 17, 2019, 08:40:PM »
That's not really the point is it? Sheila was unstable, he didn't want her making any decisions about the twins. He wanted to have 100% say in how they were brought up.
He did have that de facto if not de jure. You're really not making any sense with this line of thought.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #159 on: November 17, 2019, 08:46:PM »
He did have that de facto if not de jure. You're really not making any sense with this line of thought.

Of course I am. They had joint custody, so Sheila could make decisions and demands at any time. If Colin had sole custody, she would only have access rights.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #160 on: November 17, 2019, 09:10:PM »
Of course I am. They had joint custody, so Sheila could make decisions and demands at any time. If Colin had sole custody, she would only have access rights.
But Sheila never made the twins a weapon to be used against Colin. Read up on your facts.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #161 on: November 17, 2019, 09:11:PM »
But Sheila never made the twins a weapon to be used against Colin. Read up on your facts.

I'm not saying she did. Clearly, we do not understand each other, so let's just drop it.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #162 on: November 17, 2019, 09:15:PM »
I'm not saying she did. Clearly, we do not understand each other, so let's just drop it.



Interesting that in one day, you seem to have felt misunderstood by three different people. Perhaps it's not entirely with them that the fault lays.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #163 on: November 17, 2019, 09:19:PM »
But Sheila never made the twins a weapon to be used against Colin. Read up on your facts.





Those mothers who've murdered their children were all divorced/ split-up or separated with issues regarding access.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #164 on: November 17, 2019, 09:20:PM »




Those mothers who've murdered their children were all divorced/ split-up or separated with issues regarding access.
But lookout there was no issue regarding access! For goodness sake..