Author Topic: The ITV Drama  (Read 234811 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #390 on: December 30, 2019, 05:32:PM »
NOTW paid for JM's hotel accommodation too. EP paid JM for the 32 times she gave evidence on each of her attendances.
The same applied to Virginia Greaves waiting for Jeremy to greet her in a Chelmsford hotel. I won't drag up the relevant post.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #391 on: December 30, 2019, 05:36:PM »
The same applied to Virginia Greaves waiting for Jeremy to greet her in a Chelmsford hotel. I won't drag up the relevant post.





I bet she paid for that herself.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #392 on: December 30, 2019, 05:37:PM »
If Jeremy had gone to the press because he was found innocent I think he would have quite rightly had a lot to say .

But we will never know will we . Again all speculation .

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #393 on: December 30, 2019, 05:38:PM »
NOTW paid for JM's hotel accommodation too. EP paid JM for the 32 times she gave evidence on each of her attendances.


I believe it's customary for police to provide cover for witnesses travel arrangements. Julie was a student for God's sake.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #394 on: December 30, 2019, 05:51:PM »

I believe it's customary for police to provide cover for witnesses travel arrangements. Julie was a student for God's sake.

expenses yes.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #395 on: December 30, 2019, 05:55:PM »
..and what about Jeremy's deal? Was that relevant in relation to his credibility in testifying in his own defence?
the law in this country is well established. Jeremy was on trial. He had nothing to prove. That was arlidges job
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #396 on: December 30, 2019, 05:56:PM »
expenses yes.


THAT was the word I was looking for!!

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #397 on: December 30, 2019, 05:58:PM »
..and what about Jeremy's deal? Was that relevant in relation to his credibility in testifying in his own defence?

Jeremy's deal was a completely different matter, for several reasons already explained here several times.  First, there was nothing improper in Jeremy as a defendant entering into an agreement with a newspaper.  It is frequently done and there can be no criticism of it.  It was however totally improper for JM to enter into such a deal and she compounded that by lying about it when asked during the trial.


Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #398 on: December 30, 2019, 06:00:PM »
How would a promise of money influence his evidence? He was on trial for the murders ? What could be offered to him that would affect his testimony?

The law  regarding inducements applies to those who appear as witnesses not the accused .

Quite right.


Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #399 on: December 30, 2019, 06:01:PM »
If the jury should have been informed about an alleged signing of a News of the World deal by Julie pre-trial then they should also have been made aware of a similar deal in place for Jeremy Bamber.

Utter nonsense.


Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #400 on: December 30, 2019, 06:02:PM »
The same applied to Virginia Greaves waiting for Jeremy to greet her in a Chelmsford hotel. I won't drag up the relevant post.

What is the relevance of that?  It could have no bearing on the trial at all.


Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #401 on: December 30, 2019, 06:03:PM »
Utter nonsense.
Your whole campaign to release a mass murderer is utter nonsense.

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #402 on: December 30, 2019, 06:08:PM »
Your whole campaign to release a mass murderer is utter nonsense.

You are as usual thoroughly offensive.  I have never campaigned to release a mass murderer, as you know.

Your defence of the indefensible Julie Mugford is utter nonsense and irrational.


guest7363

  • Guest
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #403 on: December 30, 2019, 06:09:PM »
Jeremy's deal was a completely different matter, for several reasons already explained here several times.  First, there was nothing improper in Jeremy as a defendant entering into an agreement with a newspaper.  It is frequently done and there can be no criticism of it.  It was however totally improper for JM to enter into such a deal and she compounded that by lying about it when asked during the trial.
I think NGB would agree with me, investigators have learnt their lesson now with appeals, they take their time investigating and have to have it case ready before CPS will look at it.  It’s very frustrating for victims but from a case being reported to actually going to court could take 2 years now. 

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #404 on: December 30, 2019, 06:11:PM »
Your whole campaign to release a mass murderer is utter nonsense.

the campaign is to release a man many believe is innocent and your remark is very personal and untrue.

Why would anyone campaign if they thought he was guilty ?