Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie?
« Last post by Adam on Yesterday at 10:27 PM »
Quote from: QCChevalier on Yesterday at 10:14 PM
It's not that Julie was blameless in the murders, the police just decided not to prosecute because her evidence was needed to convict Jeremy.

It's clear now.  Thanks Adam.

Agree with that.

They couldn't prosecute her for what Bamber told her pre massacre. She will just say she never thought Bamber was serious.

The other crimes would have just resulted in fines. So were dropped as first offences.  The police could then focus on her being a reliable witness in the massacre case.

Thanks QC.
92
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie?
« Last post by QCChevalier on Yesterday at 10:14 PM »
It's not that Julie was blameless in the murders, the police just decided not to prosecute because her evidence was needed to convict Jeremy.

It's clear now.  Thanks Adam.
93
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie?
« Last post by Adam on Yesterday at 10:10 PM »
Could the police prosecute Julie & have her as a prosecuting witness on the same case? Thought it would be one or the other.

Pretty obvious having her as a prosecuting witness is more important.

The bank could ask for charges to be pressed. This is not related to the trial. Julie would get a fine. They didn't & she paid the money back.
94
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie?
« Last post by Hartley. on Yesterday at 09:54 PM »
Quote from: Adam on Yesterday at 09:51 PM
For what? 

She approached the police. Gave a 24 page WS & told them about the caravan break in & Bamber's trips to smuggle drugs.

They could prosecute her for the cheque book fraud, which would probably be a fine. But didn't & she paid back the money.

Be counter productive prosecuting her for not approaching the police straight away, while simultaneously having her as their main witness in the same case.

Seriously?
95
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie?
« Last post by Adam on Yesterday at 09:51 PM »
Quote from: Smythe on Yesterday at 09:20 PM
Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie? When was the decision made?

For what? 

She approached the police. Gave a 24 page WS & told them about the caravan break in & Bamber's trips to smuggle drugs.

They could prosecute her for the cheque book fraud, which would probably be a fine. But didn't & she paid back the money.

Be counter productive prosecuting her for not approaching the police straight away, while simultaneously having her as their main witness in the same case.
96
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: The relatives passing information to Julie:
« Last post by QCChevalier on Yesterday at 09:47 PM »
Quote from: Adam on Yesterday at 03:32 PM
The defence being incompetent is a bit strong. But people are entitled to say this.

The police were not incompetent as the industrial frame department did it's job.

Thanks Adam.  I didn't realise Jeremy wore glasses even back then.  I suppose you're right though, as someone with good fashion sense, he would have gone for industrial-style frames.
97
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie?
« Last post by Hartley. on Yesterday at 09:38 PM »
Quote from: Smythe on Yesterday at 09:20 PM
Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie? When was the decision made?

We don't  know, I think there may be documents relating to this which are witheld, that's just my guess though.

Personally, I think she should have been prosecuted as an accomplice. If JB is guilty.
98
Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie?
« Last post by Smythe on Yesterday at 09:20 PM »
Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie? When was the decision made?
99
Off Topic / Re: US Election 2020
« Last post by Steve_uk on Yesterday at 07:19 PM »
I thought this might crop up again: the issue of whether the electoral college can survive in a country where the demography is gradually changing. https://youtu.be/flHBp1G7iLc
100
Other high profile cases / Re: juilan assange rape chardge.
« Last post by David1819 on Yesterday at 07:09 PM »
Quote from: Roch on Yesterday at 06:49 PM
At the risk of incurring an alien / flying saucer attack by David, it seems Richard Hall thinks Assange is fake.


That dose not surprise me at all. Are you having second thoughts about this guy yet?
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]