Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
It's not that Julie was blameless in the murders, the police just decided not to prosecute because her evidence was needed to convict Jeremy.

It's clear now.  Thanks Adam.

Agree with that.

They couldn't prosecute her for what Bamber told her pre massacre. She will just say she never thought Bamber was serious.

The other crimes would have just resulted in fines. So were dropped as first offences.  The police could then focus on her being a reliable witness in the massacre case.

Thanks QC.
92
It's not that Julie was blameless in the murders, the police just decided not to prosecute because her evidence was needed to convict Jeremy.

It's clear now.  Thanks Adam.
93
Could the police prosecute Julie & have her as a prosecuting witness on the same case? Thought it would be one or the other.

Pretty obvious having her as a prosecuting witness is more important.

The bank could ask for charges to be pressed. This is not related to the trial. Julie would get a fine. They didn't & she paid the money back.
94
For what? 

She approached the police. Gave a 24 page WS & told them about the caravan break in & Bamber's trips to smuggle drugs.

They could prosecute her for the cheque book fraud, which would probably be a fine. But didn't & she paid back the money.

Be counter productive prosecuting her for not approaching the police straight away, while simultaneously having her as their main witness in the same case.

Seriously?
95
Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie? When was the decision made?

For what? 

She approached the police. Gave a 24 page WS & told them about the caravan break in & Bamber's trips to smuggle drugs.

They could prosecute her for the cheque book fraud, which would probably be a fine. But didn't & she paid back the money.

Be counter productive prosecuting her for not approaching the police straight away, while simultaneously having her as their main witness in the same case.
96
The defence being incompetent is a bit strong. But people are entitled to say this.

The police were not incompetent as the industrial frame department did it's job.

Thanks Adam.  I didn't realise Jeremy wore glasses even back then.  I suppose you're right though, as someone with good fashion sense, he would have gone for industrial-style frames.
97
Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie? When was the decision made?

We don't  know, I think there may be documents relating to this which are witheld, that's just my guess though.

Personally, I think she should have been prosecuted as an accomplice. If JB is guilty.
98
Why did the police choose not to prosecute Julie? When was the decision made?
99
Off Topic / Re: US Election 2020
« Last post by Steve_uk on Yesterday at 07:19 PM »
I thought this might crop up again: the issue of whether the electoral college can survive in a country where the demography is gradually changing. https://youtu.be/flHBp1G7iLc
100
Other high profile cases / Re: juilan assange rape chardge.
« Last post by David1819 on Yesterday at 07:09 PM »
At the risk of incurring an alien / flying saucer attack by David, it seems Richard Hall thinks Assange is fake.


That dose not surprise me at all. Are you having second thoughts about this guy yet?
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]