Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Once again plz prove what your are saying. Why would you so often criticise Sandra for what she puts up and NOW!! Ask her to back up what your saying? What side of the coin do you sit mate? I have told you that these two who ever they two were didn’t come forward at the time, here’s an even better point though, these two didn’t testify to what your saying at court.
92
I wouldn’t have put up that GD and AN OTHER called out Luke to start with. I believe your an intelligent person with much information and knowledge of this case so to simple stick stuff out there is crazy. These two didn’t even come forward for a few days after being told not to by a person on the search party. Luke has already been interviewed and treated like the culprit from day one
93
Proof(lol just imitating yourself) but c’mon everything you have just typed is conjecture at most or desperation at best
94
No I don’t believe they would have Sandra, it’s something I toyed with for a while but I always felt there was a danger to Jodi prior to all this anyway
95
that's why I don't think they were all committed in one attack it would of taken to long I believe she was in fight with somebody before she was killed I think the injury's to her face were caused then.

Some of the injuries to her face were so horrific, nugnug, it would have been impossible to "hide" them. Some of the other injuries could have been caused by a fight - the bruising to the knuckles, the back of the head, side of the eye - even the cut to the inside of her top lip could have been caused by a punch to the face.

Actually, you guys have just made an important point. Bruising. If all the blows that caused the bruising were inflicted immediately before the injuries that killed Jodi, would they have had time to become full blown bruises, given the amount of blood loss involved? I'll go investigate and come back to this!
96
of course the person who hit her may have nothing to do with the murder but of course the police would not have belived that so they wouldent have come forward.
97
I can’t help but agree with you mate
98
It’s strange you say she might have been attacked twice that night, certainly a lot of the injuries can’t be explained mainly due to the timings, again though until we get a grip of when this murder actually occurred it will seem strange. This was a very prolonged attack, fitting everything into a time frame is impossible if Luke’s the killer.

that's why I don't think they were all committed in one attack it would of taken to long I believe she was in fight with somebody before she was killed I think the injury's to her face were caused then.

99
It’s strange you say she might have been attacked twice that night, certainly a lot of the injuries can’t be explained mainly due to the timings, again though until we get a grip of when this murder actually occurred it will seem strange. This was a very prolonged attack, fitting everything into a time frame is impossible if Luke’s the killer.
100
I can’t help feeling that what Falconer told the police 3 years later was pretty accurate an account of what he did and saw that night, it only becomes contentious when placed amid  the other evidence the was brought to trial. It’s pretty unfair to him to believe otherwise and again not his fault he wasn’t detected prior to the trial and during the investigation
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]