Jeremy Bamber Forum

You disappoint me, Mike. I expected more lively and considered argument from you. You're very fond of demanding we not insult your intelligence but have few qualms about insulting mine, it would seem. I do know "Sheila was not Jeremy's daughter"!!!!  and I also know that if someone tells me something over the phone that I repeat to another, the first person is likely to become the third person. To suggest otherwise is simply a smoke screen.

A) If you truly believe Nevill made a call to the police, it's for you to prove -that log you insist proves he did does no such thing- because no call from Nevill was made, a negative can't be proved.
B) It's generally accepted that police will ask for information. It was down to Jeremy to decide what he told them, whether voluntarily or in response to questions, and as he famously said, "It's always best to tell as much of the truth as possible". The rest can be coloured any which way or simply left out, I guess.
C) "Independent witness statements allude to.........." Means precisely nothing. I've yet to see it suggested anywhere -other than here- that Sheila had made any attempts at suicide...........but saying she had certainly added 'colour' to Jeremy's narrative.
D) In relation to Sheila's alleged gun competency. "It was never fully proven that she wasn't............"? Again, negatives can't be proven. But again, it added colour to the narrative, and as WE can clearly see what sort of picture of Sheila he was painting, it wouldn't have been lost on the police, either.
E) Are you saying there's the possibility a relative was there at the scene with or without Jeremy's knowledge?
F) But i'm not talking about what relatives said further down the line, or anything other than the immediacy of a particular situation in which Jeremy was centre stage.


The rest is simply your opinion to which you're fully entitled. For myself, I have as much belief in Nevill's call to the police -I'd be interested to know how you're claiming he made that call and whether you think he looked up the number or called 999- as I have in police shooting Sheila. By the way, thank-you for posting those statements and reports that you've found. I was fascinated and amused to read that Ainsley's thoughts seem to match my own..................and we've never even met!!!!!

With this in mind, it looks almost certain that the prosecution and its experts loaded the evidence in their favour by seeking to rely upon inaccurate results concerning the differences in the levels of lead deposit found on the hand swabs of Sheila Caffell, as opposed to the hand swabs of lab' volunteers..

It may not come as a surprise to any of you, that DS Jones was / is also involved in the tampering's with the batch of crime scene ammunitions so that a false case could be presented along the lines that these shootings were a one gun crime (when in actual fact they were not) - at least two different guns were used in the shootings...