Jeremy Bamber Forum

OTHER HIGH PROFILE CASES => Luke Mitchell and the murder of Jodi Jones => Topic started by: nugnug on September 25, 2019, 11:13:AM

Title: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 25, 2019, 11:13:AM
shame we havent got the rst of it but still worth a watch.

https://youtu.be/DTIdhoCwnLc
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: sandra L on September 25, 2019, 02:27:PM
Hoping to get the rest out soon
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 25, 2019, 03:58:PM
ilookforward to that.

is peter hills documentary still avaivlable.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Lithium on September 25, 2019, 06:58:PM
What's the hold up?
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Davie2 on September 25, 2019, 10:46:PM
Is this the same documentary that never made it to air, cause of its extreme BS?
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: sandra L on September 26, 2019, 08:58:AM
Do your homework, Davie.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Davie2 on September 27, 2019, 03:53:PM
We all know the producers of this frontline were fed BS. A certain Mr Forbes the fraud was caught red handed.

But yea, lets see the rest, give us all a laugh, or do we have to wait another 5 years of fake (it will be uploaded soon BS)
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 27, 2019, 04:39:PM
We all know the producers of this frontline were fed BS. A certain Mr Forbes the fraud was caught red handed.

But yea, lets see the rest, give us all a laugh, or do we have to wait another 5 years of fake (it will be uploaded soon BS)

was the patholgist lying to them when he did the interveiew
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Davie2 on September 27, 2019, 06:34:PM
Why did the documentary get the dunt?
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: sandra L on September 27, 2019, 06:58:PM
It didn't. It was aired a few weeks after it was originally scheduled ( legal i dotting and t crossing, I believe).

Is it actually being suggested that some of the country's most respected experts - Tim Valentine, John Scott, Roy Ramm, Keith Ashcroft ... as well as Professor Busuttil ... were fed BS by myself and Corinne and that managed to get to them through the entire BBC production process???

A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.
 
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: WakeyWakey on September 27, 2019, 07:07:PM
A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.
 

what has been claimed by posters about scott forbes?
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 27, 2019, 07:19:PM
what scott forbs said was not all that relvant anyway.

he jut proposed an alternative suspect who is one of many.

and in my veiw not really a credible suspect.

Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Lithium on September 27, 2019, 08:18:PM
A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.

Really? So the essay actually existed?

Liar.

Or innocent omission maybe.  ::)
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 27, 2019, 08:24:PM
it makes no real diffrence weather it did or dident as far as i am concerned writing a weird essy doesnt you a killer.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Davie2 on September 27, 2019, 08:42:PM
It didn't. It was aired a few weeks after it was originally scheduled ( legal i dotting and t crossing, I believe).

Is it actually being suggested that some of the country's most respected experts - Tim Valentine, John Scott, Roy Ramm, Keith Ashcroft ... as well as Professor Busuttil ... were fed BS by myself and Corinne and that managed to get to them through the entire BBC production process???

A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.

Did not.

Who cares.

Lies.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 27, 2019, 08:47:PM
scot forbes is probely the least important person in that documentary anyway.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Lithium on September 28, 2019, 01:47:PM
Really? So the essay actually existed?

Liar.

Or innocent omission maybe.  ::)

*ahem*
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 28, 2019, 02:12:PM
im more intrested iin what the prof says than scott forbes.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Lithium on September 28, 2019, 02:36:PM
But yea, lets see the rest, give us all a laugh, or do we have to wait another 5 years of fake (it will be uploaded soon BS)

Dr Sandra Lean
2 months ago
There will be soon - just got some stuff to sort out first!


 ::) ::) ::)

Takes 1 hour to upload.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Lithium on September 28, 2019, 02:42:PM
im more intrested iin what the prof says than scott forbes.

What, that it's likely the killer would have Jodi's blood on him but this doesn't tell us it couldn't have been Luke? Then goes on to explain this by saying that evidence was "probably" lost because the body was left out in the rain overnight.

well STOP THE PRESS!

I don't take this to mean this professor believes Luke is innocent at all. I might e-mail him and ask.

Also, Besutil knows nothing of the missing Parka.

He's describing a hypothetical scenario presented to him by Sam Polling.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 28, 2019, 02:49:PM
What, that it's likely the killer would have Jodi's blood on him but this doesn't tell us it couldn't have been Luke, just less likely? Then goes on to explain this by saying that evidence was "probably" lost because the body was left out in the rain overnight.

well STOP THE PRESS!

I don't take this to mean this professor believes Luke is innocent at all. I might e-mail him and ask.

Also, Besutil knows nothing of the missing Parka.

He's describing a hypothetical scenario presented to him by Sam Polling.

he wouldent of gone on the show if he dident have some doubts.

Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Lithium on September 28, 2019, 02:51:PM
he wouldent of gone on the show if he dident have some doubts.

Really? He was invited on the show as an expert who worked on the case, his personal opinion wasn't expressed in any way. I'll email him. To let him know that Luke's supporters are presuming/claiming he believes in Luke's innocence because he offered to answer some hypothetical questions posed by Frontline.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: nugnug on September 28, 2019, 03:09:PM
Really? He was invited on the show as an expert who worked on the case, his personal opinion wasn't expressed in any way. I'll email him. To let him know that Luke's supporters are presuming/claiming he believes in Luke's innocence because he offered to answer some hypothetical questions posed by Frontline.

of course he dident say luke was innocent say who did and dident do it.

the fct his words in the documentry contradict the prscution case.

and you do have a right to refuse to go on a documentry.
Title: Re: frontline documentry.
Post by: Davie2 on November 19, 2019, 10:32:PM
Been away a while, when is the rest getting uploaded? We were promised soon, 2 months ago. I do want to see Forbes crying like a baby, spewing his guts accusing an innocent man of murder.