Jeremy Bamber Forum

Phillip said Bamber would be spotted from a long way away. Obviously the light was good. As GG & RB said.

How else would 2am farmers and bike thieves operate?

Exactly

Who the hell would see a man drive an astra at 2am in a sleepy hangar ?

They certainly didn't an hour and half later

The world did feel safer. I don't know whether that was an illusion.

   I’m in two minds about this, Roch, leaning towards illusion. Some of “Trumps” actions in office were equally acts of war and brought us to the brink. The murder of Iranian General Soleimani in Baghdad being probably the most egregious of these actions, in my view. The Iranian response on that occasion was to strike two US bases in Iraq with a volley of pinpoint missiles. “Trump” vowed, “if a single hair of any US personnel were harmed that Iran would be obliterated” or some such. As it turned out over 100 US personnel were injured as admitted by the U.S. after some weeks.
    Even this string of events allows for some ambiguity however. The US or “Trump” didn’t respond to the Iranian attack, which was a direct attack on US personnel. The fact that the Iranian response was legitimate was not a factor in the US non response. Whether this restraint by the US or “Trump” was because of “Trump” or informed by other factors is where some ambiguity lies. I don’t really believe it matters who the US president is. US restraint was more likely because of the demonstration of power by Iran and the obvious threat to all US bases in the Middle East should the US escalate. The US bases were hit only with missiles using kinetic power to damage the two U.S. bases, that is no warheads on the missiles. The implied threat is apparent to all.
     That is why I refer to Trump using inverted commas-I’m not sure that even Trump has complete agency to act unilaterally.
     I believe the damage is extensive at the two Israeli airbases and likewise with the attack on the US bases, there is a much larger implied threat waiting in the wings should Israel choose to escalate.

That's not how a cross examination works. If you are not asked you don't  answer. Believe me from experience

You got in the stand you do direct by your own counsel, then you are crossed. ( Prosecution )

The cross transcript is on here which I provided.

He wasn't asked. He can't just go off tangent. He is there to answer questions.

If he starts rambling about something which is not what he was asked the judge will scold him and tell him to stick to what's been put to him and answer the relevant question from the prosecutor.

He could have asked his defence lawyer to ask him about The Sea Wall.

Although had the option to say it couldn't be cycled after being accused that he did.

But the TikTok video is better late than never.

You are flogging a dead horse Rob.

Apparently Bamber had every artificial light artifact that night.

Bit of fun ILB 

There's nothing in his interviews about the sea wall.

Whether it's in the direct by Rivlin I'm not sure as no transcript has survived the test of time.