2008 Appeal Judgement

[David1819]

https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

[Steve_uk]

https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

It seems that the identification evidence played a large part in the conviction. I don't see how after admitting that the case was wholly circumstantial, criticizing Police tactics on questioning though overlooking the impact of the urine and tattoo evidence they still brought themselves to dismiss the appeal. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7247137.stm

[David1819]

It seems that the identification evidence played a large part in the conviction. I don't see how after admitting that the case was wholly circumstantial, criticizing Police tactics on questioning though overlooking the impact of the urine and tattoo evidence they still brought themselves to dismiss the appeal. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7247137.stm

Have you actually bothered to read the appeal judgement?

[Steve_uk]

Have you actually bothered to read the appeal judgement?

It's not there is it Tom, but I read the summary. Whilst you're about it David, since you're the master of dredging up old threads could you find Jeremy Bamber: the Prelude, the Tragedy and the Aftermath for me..