Author Topic: 2008 Appeal Judgement  (Read 305 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12893
Re: 2008 Appeal Judgement
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2019, 09:36:PM »
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
It seems that the identification evidence played a large part in the conviction. I don't see how after admitting that the case was wholly circumstantial, criticizing Police tactics on questioning though overlooking the impact of the urine and tattoo evidence they still brought themselves to dismiss the appeal. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7247137.stm

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8920
Re: 2008 Appeal Judgement
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2019, 10:08:PM »
It seems that the identification evidence played a large part in the conviction. I don't see how after admitting that the case was wholly circumstantial, criticizing Police tactics on questioning though overlooking the impact of the urine and tattoo evidence they still brought themselves to dismiss the appeal. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7247137.stm

Have you actually bothered to read the appeal judgement?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12893
Re: 2008 Appeal Judgement
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2019, 05:08:PM »
Have you actually bothered to read the appeal judgement?
It's not there is it Tom, but I read the summary. Whilst you're about it David, since you're the master of dredging up old threads could you find Jeremy Bamber: the Prelude, the Tragedy and the Aftermath for me..