Author Topic: frontline documentry.  (Read 378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15042
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
frontline documentry.
« on: September 25, 2019, 11:13:AM »
shame we havent got the rst of it but still worth a watch.

https://youtu.be/DTIdhoCwnLc

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 954
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2019, 02:27:PM »
Hoping to get the rest out soon

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15042
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2019, 03:58:PM »
ilookforward to that.

is peter hills documentary still avaivlable.

Offline Lithium

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 500
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2019, 06:58:PM »
What's the hold up?

Offline Davie2

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2019, 10:46:PM »
Is this the same documentary that never made it to air, cause of its extreme BS?

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 954
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2019, 08:58:AM »
Do your homework, Davie.

Offline Davie2

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2019, 03:53:PM »
We all know the producers of this frontline were fed BS. A certain Mr Forbes the fraud was caught red handed.

But yea, lets see the rest, give us all a laugh, or do we have to wait another 5 years of fake (it will be uploaded soon BS)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15042
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2019, 04:39:PM »
We all know the producers of this frontline were fed BS. A certain Mr Forbes the fraud was caught red handed.

But yea, lets see the rest, give us all a laugh, or do we have to wait another 5 years of fake (it will be uploaded soon BS)

was the patholgist lying to them when he did the interveiew

Offline Davie2

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2019, 06:34:PM »
Why did the documentary get the dunt?

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 954
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2019, 06:58:PM »
It didn't. It was aired a few weeks after it was originally scheduled ( legal i dotting and t crossing, I believe).

Is it actually being suggested that some of the country's most respected experts - Tim Valentine, John Scott, Roy Ramm, Keith Ashcroft ... as well as Professor Busuttil ... were fed BS by myself and Corinne and that managed to get to them through the entire BBC production process???

A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.
 

Offline WakeyWakey

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2019, 07:07:PM »
A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.
 

what has been claimed by posters about scott forbes?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15042
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2019, 07:19:PM »
what scott forbs said was not all that relvant anyway.

he jut proposed an alternative suspect who is one of many.

and in my veiw not really a credible suspect.


Offline Lithium

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 500
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #12 on: September 27, 2019, 08:18:PM »
A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.

Really? So the essay actually existed?

Liar.

Or innocent omission maybe.  ::)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15042
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2019, 08:24:PM »
it makes no real diffrence weather it did or dident as far as i am concerned writing a weird essy doesnt you a killer.

Offline Davie2

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: frontline documentry.
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2019, 08:42:PM »
It didn't. It was aired a few weeks after it was originally scheduled ( legal i dotting and t crossing, I believe).

Is it actually being suggested that some of the country's most respected experts - Tim Valentine, John Scott, Roy Ramm, Keith Ashcroft ... as well as Professor Busuttil ... were fed BS by myself and Corinne and that managed to get to them through the entire BBC production process???

A certain Mr Forbes was proven, two years later, to have been telling the truth all along - every single thing he said was supported by statements and other evidence in the case files. Nothing fraudulent about Mr Forbes, other than the claims of anonymous posters, which cannot be backed up with evidence, about him.

Did not.

Who cares.

Lies.