This is how I see it, I’ve said a lot of it before but still nobody has said anything to show Luke’s guilt or innocence, and I for one would welcome a retrial
There is a lot of disturbing information about Luke some it seems confirmed and other things not, a lot of hearsay and opinions but it’s the facts that matter and for me there is just not enough facts showing Luke’s guilt.
dog finding body - dog was a trained tracker
Sighting at top - definitely not Jodi and Luke
Sighting at bottom - debatable if this is Luke, even if it is that is no proof of anything alone
Black dahlia- no connection
Urine bottles - strange but no proof of murder, also is there evidence these were there before the murder?
His bro not confirming Luke was home - he did, but then was distressed and tied in knots on the stand and his statement was pulled apart by a clever lawyer doing what lawyers do. So for me this is not proven either way
Means - yes he had access to knifes and imo the physical ability to commit the crime
Motive - no known motive
Opportunity - debatable, evidence he was at home, even if that is not accepted the timeframe for murder seems very tight, with the addition of the people on the path at the time making the timeframe even less likely.
Dna - nothing found linking Jodi and Luke, expert confirmed this lack of dna made it unlikely to be Luke
Other hard Evidence - none
Circumstantial evidence - plenty but most, if not all, have acceptable explanations, certainly imo is in no way proof of Luke being the murderer without reasonable doubt
I’ve said it before, for me this could all be cleared up if his bro was to confirm once and for all, was Luke at home making tea or was he alone in the house looking at stuff on the net. Then again it could be that he just cant remember, for sure, what took place on that evening. If that’s the case then back to square one it is..
