JB petition now has almost ten thousand signatures.

[Caroline]

Could you argue this against the legal team ?

Absolutely!

[Caroline]

If, for instance they have a witness who was at the scene ? 

At what scene?

[Caroline]

At what scene?

Was this 'person' standing behind Nevill when he made the supposed call?

When you talk about a 'legal team' I suspect you are talking about the Campaign Team?

Perhaps the CT would like to explain why Jeremy denied calling the police as late as 03:36 UNTIL the silly story appeared about a supposed call from Nevill? Not only did he deny it, he wanted to being a prosecution against West, accusing him of lying.

Also, perhaps they might also like to explain why Bonnett (a civilian employee) would lie about who he spoke to that night?

[lookout]

At what scene?

At WHF in the aftermath.

[Caroline]

At WHF in the aftermath.

So how on earth does that prove a cal from Nevill?

[Caroline]

The CT are suggesting that Saxby's statement proves a call from Nevill, it proves nothing of the sort. What it does prove, is that West wrote the wrong time on the log and nothing more.

[Jane]

If, for instance they have a witness who was at the scene ? 

At the scene? THAT early on? So now it's being suggested that for no valid reason a call from Nevill was withheld? Didn't Jeremy change his mind about the time of his call? Wasn't he put on hold for several minutes when he got through. You  -and whoever THEY are- may take it as the absolute and irrefutable truth that if Jeremy didn't make that call until 3.36 and was put on hold for several minutes, there's no way on earth that he could have got dressed, got in his car and driven it at 30 miles an hour, stop to put a sweater on, and reach WHF by 3.50.

[Reader]

Aren't you making an assumption as to when he got dressed? I don't recall that Jeremy ever gave details about that.

[Caroline]

Aren't you making an assumption as to when he got dressed? I don't recall that Jeremy ever gave details about that.

Dear god!

[lookout]

Dear god!

Be fair Caroline.You always want to know the ins and outs of why a poster said what they did.The dog with a bone effect ?

[lookout]

No need for hostilities, eh ?

[Caroline]

Be fair Caroline.You always want to know the ins and outs of why a poster said what they did.The dog with a bone effect ?

Only if they make empty claims and won’t back them up.

[lookout]

Only if they make empty claims and won’t back them up.

It was a question that Reader asked, not a claim. The claim belonged to Jane.

[Caroline]

It was a question that Reader asked, not a claim. The claim belonged to Jane.

One which Reader seems obsessed with instead of just asking she/he goes off half cocked as usual.

[lookout]

One which Reader seems obsessed with instead of just asking she/he goes off half cocked as usual.

I didn't see any " obsession " , well certainly nothing that goes beyond your own obsession with the hand on the nightdress debacle. Reader's only been here 5 minutes, not what I'd call an obsession either.