Author Topic: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.  (Read 3555 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« on: July 25, 2019, 04:35:PM »
were is it.

I haven't heard anything more about it.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2019, 04:37:PM by nugnug »

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2019, 08:59:AM »

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2019, 11:11:AM »
was this a load of bullshit.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7177
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2019, 12:33:PM »
would you care to adress this david.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9933.0.html

Since its rather apparent to me you are being salty due to my recent conclusions on Luke Mitchell. I don't see why I should dignify the question with an response.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2019, 12:41:PM »
Since its rather apparent to me you are being salty due to my recent conclusions on Luke Mitchell. I don't see why I should dignify the question with an response.

in other words you cant answer the qustion.

you have a chance to totally humliate me if it turns out there is a forensic breakthrough why not take it.

there isnt one is there.

well your right aboyt it being about lukes thread becouse after that i came the conclusion raher daft or rather untill then i had given you the benfit of the doubt.

but as the cliams you made were patenly untue i thought it was time to call you out.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2019, 01:05:AM by nugnug »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 24149
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2019, 12:36:AM »
in other you cant answer the qustion.

you have a chance to totally humliate me if it turns out there is a forensic breakthrough why not take it.
 I have asked Daid to ask Jermy
there isnt one is there.

I did tell you it was about the palm print - old news - but you didn't believe me. I don't know what David has done with it but even if it can be proven that the 'palm print; is from Sheila, if wouldn't prove Bamber innocent. In fact I have asked David to ask Jeremy about the bible pages, but I don't think he has.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40622
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2019, 10:48:AM »
I'd like to add that the palm print was smaller than Sheila's whose hand and fingers were long and slender.
Because June had the most bloodstained body I'd have said it was her hand and not Sheila's who, you remember, had perfectly clean hands.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 24149
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2019, 05:26:PM »
I'd like to add that the palm print was smaller than Sheila's whose hand and fingers were long and slender.
Because June had the most bloodstained body I'd have said it was her hand and not Sheila's who, you remember, had perfectly clean hands.

It's only a partial print.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40622
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2019, 08:57:PM »
No blood on Sheila's hand/palm to prove it was hers ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 24149
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2019, 12:07:AM »
No blood on Sheila's hand/palm to prove it was hers ?

Read the autopsy report.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40622
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2019, 09:32:AM »
Vanezis said her hands were clean ? Even Hammersley had said that only the back of her hand was bloodstained and not her open hands which he'd said were clean ?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40622
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2019, 09:40:AM »
I think Fletcher described her hands as being clean and free from oil/residue/blood.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 24149
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #12 on: July 29, 2019, 12:35:PM »
I think Fletcher described her hands as being clean and free from oil/residue/blood.

We have been through this many. Vanezis was contradictory in respect to Sheila's hands.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40622
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2019, 02:02:PM »
Yes indeed, a lot of contradictions considering the enormity of the case. Too many.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2019, 11:59:AM »
I did tell you it was about the palm print - old news - but you didn't believe me. I don't know what David has done with it but even if it can be proven that the 'palm print; is from Sheila, if wouldn't prove Bamber innocent. In fact I have asked David to ask Jeremy about the bible pages, but I don't think he has.

id rather here it from him not that his going to answer
« Last Edit: August 11, 2019, 02:32:PM by nugnug »