Craig Murray was barred from the courtroom yesterday: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/03/the-long-dark-night-of-the-soul/
Is it my imagination or was this the offending piece:
The day was dramatic enough, mostly consisting of Alex Salmond in the witness stand giving evidence. That evidence was startling. He stated that some of the accusations were deliberate fabrications with a political purpose. He specifically accused Ms A of fabrication, and of recruiting and encouraging five of the other accusers also to make fabrications against him. Crucially he described Ms A, whom he accused of orchestrating the fabrications, as extremely close to Nicola Sturgeon, and did so in terms so graphic and detailed that I cannot repeat them as it would identify Ms A.
No details have been given for the alleged "possible contempt". It is more likely that Mr.Murray's reporting has presented both the prosecution and defence cases and reported proceedings accurately. His reporting on both this case, and the circus that passes for due process in the Assange farce, has been invaluable. The BBC, Guardian et al have been very selective in their reporting of events in a way that is beneficial to the prosecution and detrimental to the defence. The coverage in the media, as with Assange, is so jarringly biased that anyone with an above room temperature IQ should see through it.
Read Craig Murray's daily report of proceedings and it is eye opening if you have been relying on MSM coverage.
One of the most startling aspects, to me at least, was the questioning of the witnesses called by the defence. Despite several witnesses giving evidence that directly contradicted prosecution witness claims, none of them were cross examined by the prosecution. They were not challenged on their evidence even though it could not be true if the prosecution claims were true.
From Craig Murray's blog;
That concluded the day’s proceedings. It was a day on which defence witnesses directly contradicted evidence from the accusers on a number of key points, most importantly but by no means solely on the question of whether Ms H was present at all at the event where she claimed to have been the victim of attempted rape. It was also given in evidence that people had not reported incidents they said they had reported, and there was no civil service policy against women working alone in the evening with Alex Salmond – which claim had been one of the MSM’s most lurid headlines.
Read the full coverage for the details of this but it is telling that you would know none of this if you relied on the BBC, Guardian and the rest of the MSM.