Everything points to Sheila being in control of the anshuzt rifle, which she used to shoot dead, one or more, of the other 4 victims without the involvement of anybody else!
The circumstances of her own death is surrounded in 'a shroud of mystery'!
I do not consider myself to be a fool, I deal with what is placed in front of me...
I can't see how Sheila could possibly then have been shot dead by an additional party, after she had shot everyone else dead? Since, if someone else had been involved, in the shooting tragedy, there would have been some sort of evidence confirming that this was / is what occurred, or had happened?.
Everything points to the other 4 victims having been shot, attacked, and killed off, by Sheila Caffell, including the fact the other 4 victims had been shot by Sheila ( no evidence exists, or was adduced during the trial, to suggest that Sheila, herself could not have, or did not, or that she had not killed off any of the other 4 victims) - everything points to the blood belonging to Sheila Caffell being found 'inside' the silencer..
The current evidence suggests that the scientific and forensic evidence which does not support this view - has been, misinterpreted, and dishonestly relied upon, (how, therefore, could police message log contents be so misleading, and not properly explained by all the parties concerned)?
The truth is out there, please let's find it, and interpret it, as it was / is meant to be interpreted?