Author Topic: The, Oh 'So Obvious link to body downstairs' and 1st shot to Sheila's Neck..  (Read 1410 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
When  I first saw the photograph of Sheila's body laid on top of her parents bed upstairs, I was more than just a little concerned that by the time that photograph was taken (by 1st SOCO team), that she had only been shot just the once, by that stage!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
When  I first saw the photograph of Sheila's body laid on top of her parents bed upstairs, I was more than just a little concerned that by the time that photograph was taken (by 1st SOCO team), that she had only been shot just the once, by that stage!

Once the timed police radio message log contents were uncovered, it puzzled me as to how her death had been reported downstairs, and yet there was her body laying on top of her parents bed with only one bullet entry wound to her neck! At the time her body was photographed laying on the bed she had only been shot once, so how could she have been thought to be dead downstairs in the kitchen? What also becomes clear is that whoever took the photographs of Sheila laid on top of the bed, must have done so, after the police surgeon, Dr Craig had already pronounced Sheila as being dead, her body being 'on the far side of the bed' at precisely 8.44am..

It is interesting to note, that when mention is made to Sheila's body being the dead female downstairs in the kitchen, that all such references are accompanied by the precise time of day, and that Dr Craig comes along at 8.44am, which effectively is the very first occasion, that the body count downstairs (two bodies) and upstairs (a further three bodies), changes, so that from 8.44am we are effectively being told that by then there was only one body downstairs in the kitchen, and the other four bodies were found to be present upstairs, meaning four bodies, without any explanation for the displacement of one female body from downstairs to upstairs, during a window of opportunities which must have occurred at some point between 8.13am and 8.44am - but no account is offered to satisfy a curious onlooker who has got a good grasp of the caos that exists, between two different evidential platforms. For example, the so called individually timed police radio message log contents, versus the witness statement version of the events! In the former example, (a) all messages are accompanied by specific times, whereas, (b) in the latter example, with the exception of Dr Craig (8.44am), police officers do not make reference to the time of day when they found each of the five bodies in turn!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Once the timed police radio message log contents were uncovered, it puzzled me as to how her death had been reported downstairs, and yet there was her body laying on top of her parents bed with only one bullet entry wound to her neck! At the time her body was photographed laying on the bed she had only been shot once, so how could she have been thought to be dead downstairs in the kitchen? What also becomes clear is that whoever took the photographs of Sheila laid on top of the bed, must have done so, after the police surgeon, Dr Craig had already pronounced Sheila as being dead, her body being 'on the far side of the bed' at precisely 8.44am..

It is interesting to note, that when mention is made to Sheila's body being the dead female downstairs in the kitchen, that all such references are accompanied by the precise time of day, and that Dr Craig comes along at 8.44am, which effectively is the very first occasion, that the body count downstairs (two bodies) and upstairs (a further three bodies), changes, so that from 8.44am we are effectively being told that by then there was only one body downstairs in the kitchen, and the other four bodies were found to be present upstairs, meaning four bodies, without any explanation for the displacement of one female body from downstairs to upstairs, during a window of opportunities which must have occurred at some point between 8.13am and 8.44am - but no account is offered to satisfy a curious onlooker who has got a good grasp of the caos that exists, between two different evidential platforms. For example, the so called individually timed police radio message log contents, versus the witness statement version of the events! In the former example, (a) all messages are accompanied by specific times, whereas, (b) in the latter example, with the exception of Dr Craig (8.44am), police officers do not make reference to the time of day when they found each of the five bodies in turn!

Sandwiched inbetween both versions of these events  (timed radio message log versus with the witness statement accounts) is the startling revelation that senior officers, a 1st team of SOCO (who photographed Sheila’s body laid on the bed), and a 2nd team of firearm officers who carried out a re-enactment of the entry into the farmhouse once the body of Sheila Caffell had been restaged with a 2nd shot to her neck on the bedroom floor had been finalised..

Once, the restaged position of Sheila’s body had been reset and provisionally photographed again by the 1st SOCO team, the 2nd SOCO team we’re permitted to take control of the restaged crime scene to record the scene in the farmhouse as though it had been discovered like this by the original firearm officers after 7.30am - but it was all a big lie, a huge deception designed to conceal police involvement in Sheila’s Death...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The truth is about to be accepted by anybody, and everybody interested in the truth, not a corrupted truth by evil men, and by evil women!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Never, in the history of the criminal justice system, or any case brought before a jury - had two entirely different accounts concerning where the bodies of victims were found, as told by the police themselves, surely even ordinary members of the public could work it out for themselves, without being a member of any jury, as to where the truth lay, or lies, since how could the prosecution's case, be that two bodies were found downstairs in the kitchen, and only three bodies be upstairs in the bedrooms, and also be a case of there only being one body downstairs,and four bodies, upstairs?

Imagine that...

And the defence not needing to raise any e idence at all in such a one sided, bias prosecution!!!!
« Last Edit: December 03, 2018, 05:00:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Never, in the history of the criminal justice system, or any case brought before a jury - had two entirely different accounts concerning where the bodies of victims were found, as told by the police themselves, surely even ordinary members of the public could work it out for themselves, without being a member of any jury, as to where the truth lay, or lies, since how could the prosecution's case, be that two bodies were found downstairs in the kitchen, and only three bodies be upstairs in the bedrooms, and also be a case of there only being one body downstairs,and four bodies, upstairs?

Imagine that...

And the defence not needing to raise any e idence at all in such a one sided, bias prosecution!!!!

I am here to address the truth, whether you support the corrupted prosecution,  or not...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Everybody, should be wanting to know, who the people who were involved in these 'informative' activities! We need names, and we need a proper description regarding what they all did individually and collectively! We need to know if they touched or  moved anything, we need to know who took photographs, and the video footage!

Let me also say, that the CCRC are basically ineffective, because they are part of the corrupted Criminal justice system, it pretends it is out to expose! No, sorry, they are part of the problem, they get paid good salaries but are just in a position to protect the criminality of those who are involved in their own system - the CCRC are not fit for purpose, they are basically in it to protect those involved in incriminating activity, the lot of 'em are criminals who wouldn't know the truth if it hit them in the face! Tax payers money being wasted on that lot! What good does the CCRC (not much)do, they are a complete waste of time ( money for old rope)..

In the Bamber case, they have admitted that there exists a crime scene video, but have refused to let Jeremy Bamber see it, because they say it is too disturbing and stressful for him to see! Can you imagine that?

So,  a crime scene video exists, but who took the footage?

Not PC Bird (2nd SOCO team), so who?
« Last Edit: December 03, 2018, 08:59:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The Crime scene video which the CCRC have had access to, was taken by the 1st SICO team compromising of non other than DC Oakey and DC Henderson!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The Crime scene video which the CCRC have had access to, was taken by the 1st SICO team compromising of non other than DC Oakey and DC Henderson!

Yet, how could this possibly be true, according to what Cook, Davidson, Hammersley and Bird say? Since, according to this motley crew of 'fakers', they took control of the crime scene without anyone having touched or moved anything beforehand, and certainly nobody else taking any crime scene photographs or crime scene video footage - except for the slip up by PC Bird (2nd SOCO team) during his court testimony where he let slip that 'DC Oakey had taken one of the crime scene photographs of Sheila's body in possession of the rifles barrel resting against the left side of her neck'!
« Last Edit: December 04, 2018, 12:13:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The activities of senior officers, and the 1st SOCO team, involved in the altering, and the stage management of the crime scene, after 8.13am and certainly prior to the point where the 2nd SOCO team were given control of the overall crime scene, have not yet been widely reported upon!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...