Me either - but I wouldn't want several people as neighbours. Many people make threats - it doesn't mean they would go ahead and act on them. Avery had never threatened Teresa and he surely would have known he would be a suspect - but then again, perhaps he really is that much of a moron. I think he is most likely guilty BUT (like Bamber), I feel that some of it was engineered and that Brendan is not a reliable witness because of the methods employed to interrogate him.
Why on earth would they "engineer" evidence? There is so much why bother? You could take half the evidence away and still a jury would find him guilty. (Unlike Bamber)
Also there are many witnesses that have no motive to lie. (Unlike Bamber)
According to Rachel Haggs who worked with Teresa at Auto Trader
"RACHEL went on to indicate that she had learned STEVEN AVERY had made inappropriate comments to TERESA in the past and further had come out of the house on a previous occasion wearing only a towel."According to Dawn Pliszka who also worked with Teresa at AutoTrader
"DAWN did tell me TERESA had confided in her about STEVEN AVERY on one prior occasion. She states STEVEN had come out of the house wearing nothing but a towel one time and TERESA was somewhat concerned by that."
photo studio owner who worked with Teresa.
"He said TERESA told him she had some problems with male clients over the summer after the photo shoot; and while filling out paperwork and taking payment, she often was invited into the homes. He said TERESA said some males become verbally or physically flirtatious offering her drinks, etc. PEARCE said that he had warned her to be careful, being alone and often times in rural areas."
According to a Plumber named Michael Osmumso.
"STEVEN stated people go missing all the time and this girl may "have left for Mexico.""
Why would Steven be telling people she may have left for Mexico? ...hhhhhm
