Author Topic: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two  (Read 9834 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #300 on: November 18, 2018, 03:26:PM »
Like we said from the beginning of the thread 'watch the f'ing series'!

The series is about his guilt or innocence (allbeit very one sided) you silly sausage!
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #301 on: November 18, 2018, 03:27:PM »
The series is about his guilt or innocence (allbeit very one sided) you silly sausage!

Talking about sausages I’m hungry now  ;D
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline IndigoJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #302 on: November 18, 2018, 03:33:PM »
And so....

What is everybodies position on this case now? I think Indigo and Caroline have come to thier senses now.

What about Buddy and Jon? or are they still in Netflix fantasy world?

I think he's guilty.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #303 on: November 18, 2018, 04:07:PM »
I think he's guilty.

To my mind there is no room for doubt. He is guilty beyond all doubt. One can safely know he is guilty.
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14620
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #304 on: November 18, 2018, 04:52:PM »
if hes guilty a dna retest will prove it beyound doubt.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #305 on: November 18, 2018, 05:05:PM »
if hes guilty a dna retest will prove it beyound doubt.

There is no DNA left on the bullet to test.

Even if we ignore the bullet. There is still a mountian of incriminating evidence that remains.
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14620
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #306 on: November 18, 2018, 05:16:PM »
There is no DNA left on the bullet to test.

Even if we ignore the bullet. There is still a mountian of incriminating evidence that remains.

we would the defence be asking for a restest if there was noting to retest.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #307 on: November 18, 2018, 06:26:PM »
we would the defence be asking for a restest if there was noting to retest.


Propaganda, smoke and mirrors!
« Last Edit: November 18, 2018, 06:37:PM by David1819 »
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 23675
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #308 on: November 18, 2018, 06:46:PM »
The series is about his guilt or innocence (allbeit very one sided) you silly sausage!

No, it's about the evidence presented - he can be guilty but on evidence which was engineered - Just like Bamber.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14620
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #309 on: November 18, 2018, 07:10:PM »

Propaganda, smoke and mirrors!

so hes passed a motion to retest dna that he knows does not exist you get disbarred for doing that.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #310 on: November 18, 2018, 07:35:PM »
No, it's about the evidence presented - he can be guilty but on evidence which was engineered - Just like Bamber.

Steven Avery is guilty and nothing was "engineered". To think otherwise requires a serious lack of critical thinking or tactical stupidity.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2018, 07:41:PM by David1819 »
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #311 on: November 18, 2018, 07:37:PM »
so hes passed a motion to retest dna that he knows does not exist you get disbarred for doing that.


Zellner is 69 years old. What does she have to lose? This is her last hurrah before retirement.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2018, 07:39:PM by David1819 »
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline IndigoJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #312 on: November 18, 2018, 08:14:PM »

Zellner is 69 years old. What does she have to lose? This is her last hurrah before retirement.

Good grief! I didn't know she was that old  :o !


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14620
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #313 on: November 18, 2018, 08:26:PM »
how many times do prosecutors claim there is no dna to test when the clearly is i remember this being said to colin stagg when he asked for dna tsting to clear his name then what do you know that convicted someone else of the crime using dna evidence.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6758
Re: Making a Murderer (Netflix) Series Two
« Reply #314 on: November 18, 2018, 08:43:PM »
how many times do prosecutors claim there is no dna to test when the clearly is i remember this being said to colin stagg when he asked for dna tsting to clear his name then what do you know that convicted someone else of the crime using dna evidence.


This was established during his trial. There was only one partial DNA profile on the bullet and only enough for one test. The DNA is now gone as it was used up in the testing. It was the victims DNA.


The prosecution are not hiding anything. The fact such a small amount of DNA was on the bullet is further proof that is was not "planted" on the bullet.
"A theory without facts is fantasy"