Author Topic: Missing references to Rhesus Positive/Negative blood and antiserum Results...  (Read 55 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45186
The blood Experts at the Lab' have been very secretive concerning whether or not the blood found in the silencer(s) was Rhesus Positive or Rhesus Negative? Also they have deliberately not included the antiserum results for the same blood (antibodies and antigens in its make up)!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45186
The blood Experts at the Lab' have been very secretive concerning whether or not the blood found in the silencer(s) was Rhesus Positive or Rhesus Negative? Also they have deliberately not included the antiserum results for the same blood (antibodies and antigens in its make up)!

They don't even confirm whether or not the five victims bloods, was either Rhesus Positive, or Negative! All they based their findings on, is blood group activity, which was not analysed sufficiently enough to warrant the claim that the blood found in the silencer(s) was unique and exclusive to Sheila Caffell, when the evidence does not support that to be the case, in the absence of Rhesus Positive and Negative factors, and antiserum configuration in the same blood...

At one point, the blood expert, John Hayward, made a witness statement stating that the blood found in the silencer(s) could have originated from either Sheila Caffell, or Robert Woodside Boutflour! At the trial, he changed his mind and said that the blood found in the silencer(s) was unique and exclusive to Sheila Caffell, but in the next breath stated there was a remote chance the blood in the silencer(s) could be an intimate mixture of the parents bloods!

His evidence was therefore full of nonsense and the trial judge ought not to have allowed his evidence to be relied upon, because at one time or another, he was saying it could have come from Sheila Caffell or Robert Woodside Boutflour, then he says it's unique and exclusive to Sheila Caffell, but that there is a remote chance it could be an intimate mixture of Ralph and June Bambers bloods!!

I am going to produce evidence now, to demonstrate, why the blood from the silencer(s) could not have been unique or exclusive to Sheila Caffell or have come from Robert Woodside Boutflour, or that it might have been an intimate mixture of the parents bloods, because the bloods for all four of these individuals was made up of different antibodies and antigens, with the Rhesus Positive and Negative aspects thrown in for good measure!

Antiserum features for the following persons:-

Sheila Caffell - 40344
Ralph Bamber - 00400
June Bamber - 40044
Nicholas Caffell - 00400
Daniel Caffell - 00400
Robert Woodside Boutflour - 40044
David Robert Boutflour - 40044
Peter Eaton - 00400

Nobody had the same antibody / antigen count in their blood as Sheila Caffell (4 0 3 4 4)

Ralph Bamber, Nichols and Daniel Caffell, and Peter Eaton's bloods had an antibody / antigen count in their bloods of ( 0 0 4 0 0)

June Bamber, Robert Woodside Boutflour, and David Robert Boutflour had an antibody / antigen count in the bloods of (4 0 0 4 4)

The experts at the Lab' have been very secretive about the antibody / antigen count in the blood found inside the silencer(s), and based on what John Hayward has stated at one time or another, there can be absolutely no way that the blood found in the silencer(s) could have originated from either Sheila Caffell or Robert Woodside Boutflour, or there be a remote chance that the blood found in the silencer(s) was an intimate mixture of Ralph and June Bambers bloods, because the antibody / antigen count in all of their bloods (with the exception of June Bamber and Robert Woodside Boutflour, who's antibody / antigen count in their bloods was the same (4 0 0 4 4), since Sheila Caffell's antibody / antigen count of her blood (4 0 3 4 4) and Ralph Bambers antibody / antigen count of his blood  (0 0 4 0 0), are fundamentally different!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45186
Here is the Lab' Evidence confirming the antiserum results per individual:-
« Last Edit: October 04, 2018, 10:58:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...