Author Topic: Silencer Evidence rigged by relatives, Cops and Lab' Experts..  (Read 10911 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Silencer Evidence rigged by relatives, Cops and Lab' Experts..
« Reply #120 on: September 22, 2018, 10:00:PM »
The truth in this matter is now out in the public domain - relatives handed over two different silencers, they handed the first one over on the 12th August 1985, and they handed the second silencer over to police on the 11th September 1985! For their part, the cops submitted the first silencer to Huntingdon Lab' on the 30th August 1985, and they submitted the second silencer to the same Lab' on the 20th September 1985. At the Lab' the first silencer was dismantled by Malcolm Fletcher on the 12th September 1985, and blood was found amongst the internal baffle plates, which when analysed produced the same blood group results belonging to Sheila Caffell and Robert Boutflour (12th, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985 - A, EAP BA, AK1 and HP 2-1). The second silencer was examined in the first instance on the 25th September 1985, on which was noted flecks of paint which were matched to the scratched mantlepiece in the kitchen of the farmhouse in tests carried out on 2nd October 1985.

Only one of these two silencers was exhibited at Jeremy Bambers trial (the second silencer) bearing an exhibit reference of DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9...

Why the big deception by relatives, Essex police, Experts from the Lab' at Huntingdon, and the CPS, if Sheila had been shot and killed with use of two bullets fired from two different guns, and if a silencer was used, or not? The cops know whether or not there was a silencer fitted onto the end of both of the rifles used in the shooting of Sheila Caffell, so why all this malarkey regarding a silencer, or a couple of silencers found at the scene by David Boutflour?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Silencer Evidence rigged by relatives, Cops and Lab' Experts..
« Reply #121 on: September 22, 2018, 10:08:PM »
Why the big deception by relatives, Essex police, Experts from the Lab' at Huntingdon, and the CPS, if Sheila had been shot and killed with use of two bullets fired from two different guns, and if a silencer was used, or not? The cops know whether or not there was a silencer fitted onto the end of both of the rifles used in the shooting of Sheila Caffell, so why all this malarkey regarding a silencer, or a couple of silencers found at the scene by David Boutflour?

Take it from me, if a silencer was used on the weapon that fired the initial shot (PV/20) across Sheila Caffell's neck in the kitchen, the cops knew about it, similarly if a silencer was used on the gun which fired the fatal bullet (PV/19) under Sheila's chin on the bedroom floor, the cops would have known about it!

From the information I have been able to gather, it is known that at least one of the silencers (SBJ/1) was collected from the scene by DS Jones, and left on the desktop in DCI Jones Office for his attention on the first morning of the police investigation (7th August 1985), which suggests to me in the strongest possible terms that cops knew that there had been a silencer attached to the barrel of at least one of the two rifles used in the shooting of Sheila...
« Last Edit: September 22, 2018, 10:11:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Silencer Evidence rigged by relatives, Cops and Lab' Experts..
« Reply #122 on: September 22, 2018, 10:16:PM »

From the information I have been able to gather, it is known that at least one of the silencers (SBJ/1) was collected from the scene by DS Jones, and left on the desktop in DCI Jones Office for his attention on the first morning of the police investigation (7th August 1985), which suggests to me in the strongest possible terms that cops knew that there had been a silencer attached to the barrel of at least one of the two rifles used in the shooting of Sheila...

The only gun this original Spencer could have been attached to, was almost certainly the mystery rifle captured in one of the crime scene photographs taken in the kitchen, which no-one was to make any mention about in their notes, pocketbook entries, reports or witness statements! With this in mind, it's possible that some of Sheila Caffell's blood got into that silencer (SBJ/1) at the time she was originally shot across the neck in the kitchen!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Silencer Evidence rigged by relatives, Cops and Lab' Experts..
« Reply #123 on: September 22, 2018, 10:25:PM »
The only gun this original Spencer could have been attached to, was almost certainly the mystery rifle captured in one of the crime scene photographs taken in the kitchen, which no-one was to make any mention about in their notes, pocketbook entries, reports or witness statements! With this in mind, it's possible that some of Sheila Caffell's blood got into that silencer (SBJ/1) at the time she was originally shot across the neck in the kitchen!

Now..

People have got to make their minds up, whether or not this original silencer (SBJ/1) was returned to the farmhouse on 9th August 1985 when DCI Jones, and DS Jones met Ann Eaton to hand her the keys to the farmhouse back?

If SBJ/1 was placed back at the scene on this occasion, it paves the way for David Boutflour to recover 'it' on the following day (10th August 1985), and in turn for Peter Eaton to hand 'it' back to DS Jones on the evening of 12th August 1985, etc...

On the other hand..

Was the silencer 'SBJ/1' part of the firearm officers equipment?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Silencer Evidence rigged by relatives, Cops and Lab' Experts..
« Reply #124 on: September 22, 2018, 10:29:PM »

On the other hand..

Was the silencer 'SBJ/1' part of the firearm officers equipment?

It is a stark fact, that there does not exist any signed exhibit label bearing the exhibit reference 'SBJ/1', only two exhibit labels marked 'DB/1' and 'DRB/1 - DB/1'..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Silencer Evidence rigged by relatives, Cops and Lab' Experts..
« Reply #125 on: September 24, 2018, 09:34:AM »
It is a stark fact, that there does not exist any signed exhibit label bearing the exhibit reference 'SBJ/1', only two exhibit labels marked 'DB/1' and 'DRB/1 - DB/1'..

The relatives only signed one of these two exhibit labels...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...