Author Topic: Sheila used to punch her children in the face, according to Freddie Emani..  (Read 195 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45186
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40034
There's no excuse for hitting children in the face, ill or not !

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27324
There's no excuse for hitting children in the face, ill or not !

I agree, but I don't believe it's anything that need concern us. It is what it is. Something allegedly said by a woman who may never have met Freddie, OR Sheila. Given that she was with Jeremy around the time of his 21st birthday the timings may not have overlapped. It's also worth remembering that the twins would only have been around a year to eighteen months old. I wonder how Sheila would have explained away such frequent bruising?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40034
I agree, but I don't believe it's anything that need concern us. It is what it is. Something allegedly said by a woman who may never have met Freddie, OR Sheila. Given that she was with Jeremy around the time of his 21st birthday the timings may not have overlapped. It's also worth remembering that the twins would only have been around a year to eighteen months old. I wonder how Sheila would have explained away such frequent bruising?






There were unexplained bruises on one or both boys though you don't appear interested in case it ever comes to light that Sheila had been incapable of looking after them and you'd been wrong all the time.

I do get a tone of desperation in your posts for some unknown reason. Very defensive. Why ??

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 23120





There were unexplained bruises on one or both boys though you don't appear interested in case it ever comes to light that Sheila had been incapable of looking after them and you'd been wrong all the time.

I do get a tone of desperation in your posts for some unknown reason. Very defensive. Why ??


When I was a kid, I had masses of 'unexplained' bruises and my parents NEVER hit me. Kids get bruises and Sheila hitting the kids in the face is just hearsay and it probably originated from Jeremy himself!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27324





There were unexplained bruises on one or both boys though you don't appear interested in case it ever comes to light that Sheila had been incapable of looking after them and you'd been wrong all the time.

I do get a tone of desperation in your posts for some unknown reason. Very defensive. Why ??

And children of that age are surrounded by those whose job it is to look out for their well being. Sheila was know to take them to the doctor/hospital for the slightest mishap. NONE of those incidents were ever seen as being suspicious. I know what you're trying to do here, Lookout. You did EXACTLY the same when you accused her of being a drug addict and previously when you said she was promiscuous.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40034

When I was a kid, I had masses of 'unexplained' bruises and my parents NEVER hit me. Kids get bruises and Sheila hitting the kids in the face is just hearsay and it probably originated from Jeremy himself!





Hearsay ? Again, when it suits. The case was built on " hearsay ". The remark came from Emami not Jeremy !

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27324




Hearsay ? Again, when it suits. The case was built on " hearsay ". The remark came from Emami not Jeremy !

And from where might HE have acquired the information?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45186
What did Freddie Emani say about these acts of violence in his unedited version of his witness statements?

Moreover, why (if it was never done) would Essex police not take what Suzette Ford had to say regarding this violent conduct towards her two little children, speak to Freddie Emani directly about such conduct, and get 'it' from the horse's mouth so to speak, so that people could brush aside any notion that Sheila had been violent towards her kids on previous occasions? It wouldn't be treated as hearsay then, if they had done that, and even now at this late stage, Freddie Emani could still make a fresh / new witness statement confirming that he had personally witnessed the violence that Sheila had inflicted on one or other of her two kids, or both of them!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6137
IIRC. According to Collins father. He was once called to take the twins away from Sheila because she thought they were the devil and might hurt them.


"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6137
What did Freddie Emani say about these acts of violence in his unedited version of his witness statements?

Moreover, why (if it was never done) would Essex police not take what Suzette Ford had to say regarding this violent conduct towards her two little children, speak to Freddie Emani directly about such conduct, and get 'it' from the horse's mouth so to speak, so that people could brush aside any notion that Sheila had been violent towards her kids on previous occasions? It wouldn't be treated as hearsay then, if they had done that, and even now at this late stage, Freddie Emani could still make a fresh / new witness statement confirming that he had personally witnessed the violence that Sheila had inflicted on one or other of her two kids, or both of them!

Not really worth exploring further.

The amount of circumstantial evidence pointing to Sheila's propensity for being a threat to the victims of the massacre is in relative abundance. If such evidence was attributed to Jeremy we would never hear the end of it.
"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40034
Well so far as I know and have read Jeremy never threatened anyone nor harmed anyone which is a sure fire diagnosis of anyone who intends harm.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27324
Well so far as I know and have read Jeremy never threatened anyone nor harmed anyone which is a sure fire diagnosis of anyone who intends harm.


Ah, but as you were so quick to tell us that there ARE unrecorded incidents of him making special journeys to escort Sheila from parties, I'm at liberty to say there ARE unrecorded incidents of Jeremy doing harm to and threatening others.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 23120
Well so far as I know and have read Jeremy never threatened anyone nor harmed anyone which is a sure fire diagnosis of anyone who intends harm.

But that's not very far is it?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45186
Not really worth exploring further.

The amount of circumstantial evidence pointing to Sheila's propensity for being a threat to the victims of the massacre is in relative abundance. If such evidence was attributed to Jeremy we would never hear the end of it.

Essex police did not want to portray Sheila as the dangerously violent parent, daughter, etc...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...