Author Topic: Nevills burns revisited.  (Read 28608 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #585 on: July 27, 2018, 12:20:PM »
Never seen ANY indication that AP knew how to enter that way and I don't believe he did! There is nothing suspicious until five members of the family all die in a shooting and claims are made to suggest all windows were secured from inside. Once you find out that the main suspect can actually get in the house regardless - all bets are off!





Like I said-----this case rests on the phone-call from Nevill, all other theories are blown out of the water.
Regardless of who got in through what window.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32549
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #586 on: July 27, 2018, 12:23:PM »




Like I said-----this case rests on the phone-call from Nevill, all other theories are blown out of the water.
Regardless of who got in through what window.

Isn't there a switched off answering machine somewhere in the mix?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #587 on: July 27, 2018, 12:28:PM »




Like I said-----this case rests on the phone-call from Nevill, all other theories are blown out of the water.
Regardless of who got in through what window.

There was no phone call from Nevil, dead men can't talk!
« Last Edit: July 27, 2018, 12:29:PM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #588 on: July 27, 2018, 12:29:PM »
Well it's HIGHLY suspicious that he knew how to get in and he had the keys BACK from AE at that point. Also WHO also knew how to get in this way?





Even CAL in her book had stated that it would have proved difficult to enter through a window and she was alleged to have " solved " the murders, though remains neutral ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32549
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #589 on: July 27, 2018, 12:33:PM »




Even CAL in her book had stated that it would have proved difficult to enter through a window and she was alleged to have " solved " the murders, though remains neutral ?

No one is denying that such would be easy for anyone who'd never done it before, but Jeremy said he had. Which means he knew how.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #590 on: July 27, 2018, 12:39:PM »
No one is denying that such would be easy for anyone who'd never done it before, but Jeremy said he had. Which means he knew how.






Of course he knew how if he'd already stated such  ::) He could have kept his mouth shut but chose not to----anybody else wouldn't have said a word knowing that the police would make mincemeat of them.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #591 on: July 27, 2018, 12:47:PM »
JB never held back on ANYTHING that was asked of him.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #592 on: July 27, 2018, 12:58:PM »




Even CAL in her book had stated that it would have proved difficult to enter through a window and she was alleged to have " solved " the murders, though remains neutral ?

Where does she say that? However, I'm not bothered what CAL say's BAMBER HIMSELF ADMITTED o usig said window and to be honest, I'm not interested in how he got in because he could have walked thrugh the front door! It's how he got out that's the crux.. The FACT that the window could be secured destoys the notion of all doors and windows being secured - he COULD get out and make it look as though the house was secure!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32549
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #593 on: July 27, 2018, 02:28:PM »





Of course he knew how if he'd already stated such  ::) He could have kept his mouth shut but chose not to----anybody else wouldn't have said a word knowing that the police would make mincemeat of them.

Well just in case one of his fellows had told the police how entry had been accessed, he was covering a base by getting in first, MEANING, he was unlikely to be questioned on it further.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #594 on: July 27, 2018, 02:29:PM »
JB never held back on ANYTHING that was asked of him.

He said "No Comment" quite a bit.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32549
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #595 on: July 27, 2018, 02:35:PM »
JB never held back on ANYTHING that was asked of him.


When he wasn't busy chewing the thread of his sweater whilst contemplating his response which was frequently "No comment".

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #596 on: July 27, 2018, 02:58:PM »
JB never held back on ANYTHING that was asked of him.

Let slip that he called Julie before the police too!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #597 on: July 27, 2018, 03:07:PM »
He said "No Comment" quite a bit.






He was entitled to instead of putting words into the mouths of the law.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #598 on: July 27, 2018, 03:14:PM »





He was entitled to instead of putting words into the mouths of the law.

 But "No comment" doesn't quite fit in with your claim of...

JB never held back on ANYTHING that was asked of him.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #599 on: July 27, 2018, 03:26:PM »
And ??