Yes it does! I didn't use a window - you don't need to - it's the principle of how you work the catch. Of course I could find window and still prove you wrong. Or you can go find your own and try a find way to NOT make it work . I knew you would look for an excuse
You didn't even use a window? Then you have not proved anything. What excuses do I need
Of course I could find window and still prove you wrong. Or you can go find your own and try a find way to NOT make it work . I knew you would look for an excuse
The burden of proof is on you not me.
You have moved a catch that's in a position that allows you to fasten the string around it and pull it in the required direction. If this catch is situated behind a closed window you have no such liberties.
From Jeremy's police interview, we know that the catch needed to be forced upwards to be unsecured. Thus to be secured it needs downward force applied instead of up. This is what has baffled me about your claim.
How can you get a string to apply downward force on the catch inside from the outside while the windows are closed? You can only secure the window onced its closed and once the window is closed you would not even be able to move the string let alone toggle the catch with it.