Author Topic: Nevills burns revisited.  (Read 28626 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12617
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #420 on: July 19, 2018, 07:54:AM »
Bamber poking the pyjama top & only the skin getting burnt. That is magic. I'm sure Bamber was not aware of such magic.
 


Look Adam. clothes do not get burned when you iron them! Its magic!







« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 08:12:AM by David1819 »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #421 on: July 19, 2018, 12:30:PM »

Look Adam. clothes do not get burned when you iron them! Its magic!




They do if you don't keep it moving or it's too hot
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #422 on: July 19, 2018, 12:30:PM »
of course it does if the silencer was on the riffel then it couldent of burned neviles back.

if they silencr wasnt used then rwb must of planted it.

Why?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #423 on: July 19, 2018, 12:38:PM »
if the silencer was on the riffle the riffle barrel would not of touched neviles skin would it.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #424 on: July 19, 2018, 12:59:PM »
if the silencer was on the riffle the riffle barrel would not of touched neviles skin would it.

No, why must (specifically) RWB have planted the silence? Why must it have been him?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 37666
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #425 on: July 19, 2018, 01:08:PM »
They do if you don't keep it moving or it's too hot

That is correct. To cause the marks on Nevill's back, Bamber would have spent several seconds burning Nevill's back. Burning through Nevill's pyjamas.

Anyway Nevill was in the perfect position for Bamber to fire 4 more head shots & lift up Nevill's pyjama top. After Bamber had lifted Nevill onto the coal scuttle.

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 37666
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #426 on: July 19, 2018, 01:12:PM »
Bamber would want to hide Nevill's burns & hope they were not really noticed by anyone.

Burning Nevill is not something a 'crazy' Sheila had the time or was calculated enough to do. 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 37666
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #427 on: July 19, 2018, 01:17:PM »
if the silencer was on the riffle the riffle barrel would not of touched neviles skin would it.

It is inconclusive whether Bamber burned Nevill's back with or without the silencer attached. Bamber claims without, but he would say that.

It is also inconclusive whether Bamber burned Nevill before or after shooting Sheila.

What is conclusive is Bamber took the silencer off after shooting Sheila for an obvious reason.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #428 on: July 19, 2018, 01:18:PM »
No, why must (specifically) RWB have planted the silence? Why must it have been him?

well hes the only credible suspect the polie dident plant becouse they dident find it rwb was the man who kicked up all the fuss abut it.

if jeremy dident use it and the burns i think prove he dident then it had to have been planted.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 37666
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #429 on: July 19, 2018, 01:32:PM »
well hes the only credible suspect the polie dident plant becouse they dident find it rwb was the man who kicked up all the fuss abut it.

if jeremy dident use it and the burns i think prove he dident then it had to have been planted.

Do you believe it possible that Bamber shot Sheila, took the silencer off, then burned Nevill's back ?

The burns may have been caused with the silencer attached, or by another rifle. No one knows. 

Either way, Bamber took off the silencer after shooting Sheila, to ensure the suicide stage was possible.

The only concensus is they are burn marks caused on the night after Bamber lifted Nevill onto the coal scuttle to shoot his head.  Specifically when during the massacre & what burning item was used, only Bamber knows.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 01:34:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #430 on: July 19, 2018, 02:04:PM »
well hes the only credible suspect the polie dident plant becouse they dident find it rwb was the man who kicked up all the fuss abut it.

if jeremy dident use it and the burns i think prove he dident then it had to have been planted.

So you're 'speculating'?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #431 on: July 19, 2018, 02:44:PM »
So you're 'speculating'?

well it could of been the eatons i suppose but then agian you dont need to prove who planted to descredit it as evdence just that it was planted and i think thats been done.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16117
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #432 on: July 19, 2018, 03:01:PM »
So you're 'speculating'?

If you're a person who believes it's a bogus exhibit, then you have to come to an acceptance that one or more prosecution witnesses had involvement, in some form, alongside any officials that were involved.  I suppose you're right - it is speculation to try and pinpoint who and I tend to regard it as some kind of 'joint venture'. 

I personally suspect DB has involvement.  Unlike some others, he's vocal in the media, as if he's a stakeholder in the conviction (because of his previous actions).

   

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #433 on: July 19, 2018, 03:13:PM »
of course if it was rwb he couldent be proscuted but sombody else could be.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #434 on: July 19, 2018, 05:15:PM »
Nevill was a heavyweight to move half- alive or dead so how to you think he was moved without showing pressure marks in doing so ?






Nobody would have moved Nevill from the chair ! If he'd been sitting leant forward he'd have fallen forward landing head first as he was, in RM. He'd have been found on the floor hitting the scuttle as he went down.

There were cushions found on the floor and also towels, both covering/mopping up the blood which was there, which means that if Nevill had stayed seated blood would have covered the front of his jacket