True enough, he may have done as you say. One stumbling block imo is that people far more qualified than myself believe he at the least had an unfair trial, I therefore feel I am far from qualified to be certain either way.
How qualified are jury members? Yet decisions are required of them. Certainly there ARE those "far more qualified" who believe he had an unfair trial, but I think that can probably be balanced by those, equally "far more qualified" who believe the correct verdict was reached. At the end of the day, it's only their opinion, to which they, like we, are entitled.