Author Topic: Nevills burns revisited.  (Read 28656 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #165 on: July 11, 2018, 04:59:PM »
It also reads that " Eaton had " overcharged " ? Nevill for some land ? Is that right ? If so why would you punch someone for that ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32561
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #166 on: July 11, 2018, 05:28:PM »
It also reads that " Eaton had " overcharged " ? Nevill for some land ? Is that right ? If so why would you punch someone for that ?

I'm sure you must have heard the adage "When drink's in, wit's out"?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #167 on: July 11, 2018, 05:31:PM »
I'm sure you must have heard the adage "When drink's in, wit's out"?






I've also heard that it's used as Dutch courage as a coward's way of settling a score !

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #168 on: July 11, 2018, 05:39:PM »
This " land " appeared to have been a bone of contention with the Eatons ?? They'd have been overcharged not undercharged. Even that alone doesn't bode well and my reckoning was that the incident occurred not long after Nevill had purchased the land and not long before the murders.
The " two " who Nevill wouldn't have turned his back on were the Eaton brothers.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32561
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #169 on: July 11, 2018, 05:41:PM »





I've also heard that it's used as Dutch courage as a coward's way of settling a score !


Comes down to the same thing in the end though. Booze befuddles.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #170 on: July 11, 2018, 05:51:PM »

Comes down to the same thing in the end though. Booze befuddles.






Would you have said the same if JB had landed out ? I think not.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32561
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #171 on: July 11, 2018, 05:53:PM »
This " land " appeared to have been a bone of contention with the Eatons ?? They'd have been overcharged not undercharged. Even that alone doesn't bode well and my reckoning was that the incident occurred not long after Nevill had purchased the land and not long before the murders.
The " two " who Nevill wouldn't have turned his back on were the Eaton brothers.

So you're now going to tell us how the pair of them conspired to turn up late at night, during a time when Sheila and the twins were there, and kill the whole family?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #172 on: July 11, 2018, 05:55:PM »
So you're now going to tell us how the pair of them conspired to turn up late at night, during a time when Sheila and the twins were there, and kill the whole family?






No. You've just suggested that. It hasn't come from me this time.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32561
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #173 on: July 11, 2018, 06:03:PM »





Would you have said the same if JB had landed out ? I think not.

Who said that, at some time, and sober, he didn't? And why would he be more impervious, than others, to the effects of alcohol.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #174 on: July 11, 2018, 06:21:PM »
Who said that, at some time, and sober, he didn't? And why would he be more impervious, than others, to the effects of alcohol.






I see. Probably something to do with him being a relative.That's okay then.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32561
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #175 on: July 11, 2018, 06:34:PM »





I see. Probably something to do with him being a relative.That's okay then.


You seem to think so. I couldn't POSSIBLY comment..................other than to say stuff happens to everyone although it's probably a damn sight harder to accept for those who live within the rigidity of shoulds and should nots.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #176 on: July 11, 2018, 09:45:PM »





Yes,because had the incident happened years before why would it even have been mentioned or even relevant to the murders ( it could have been, thinking about it ) ? And who'd broached the subject ? Unless of course it had been the last/latest entry concerning the Bamber's which could well have taken place not long before the murders.

Someone like you lookout
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #177 on: July 11, 2018, 09:48:PM »
This " land " appeared to have been a bone of contention with the Eatons ?? They'd have been overcharged not undercharged. Even that alone doesn't bode well and my reckoning was that the incident occurred not long after Nevill had purchased the land and not long before the murders.
The " two " who Nevill wouldn't have turned his back on were the Eaton brothers.

Which is totally worthless.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #178 on: July 12, 2018, 07:49:AM »
What's wrong in having my own views ? I don't remark about yours !

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 32561
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #179 on: July 12, 2018, 08:49:AM »
What's wrong in having my own views ? I don't remark about yours !

Absolutely nothing. It's the way you tell it. Also you may pride yourself in being nearly as adept at the sarcy come-back as those you accuse of it.