Author Topic: Nevills burns revisited.  (Read 28654 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #630 on: August 08, 2018, 08:51:AM »
What's the difference in the diameter of the nozzle of a shotgun against that of a rifle ?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12617
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #631 on: August 08, 2018, 08:59:AM »
What's the difference in the diameter of the nozzle of a shotgun against that of a rifle ?


a lot

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #632 on: August 08, 2018, 09:02:AM »

a lot







I'm thinking about the diameter of the burns and also the heated end of whatever weapon had been used would have left a " heat mark " as in when you heat metal.

Offline IndigoJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: Nevills burns revisited.
« Reply #633 on: August 08, 2018, 10:35:AM »
No. The gun does not get hot enough by just firing it. It needed to be heated by something. (The AGA cooker by Nevill was found on)


I believe the oval shape is due to skin elasticity.

for how long would it have needed to be "heated by something" ?

ah yes due to his age then that the shape appeared as it did?