Do you just ignore the points that don't fall in line with your argument? There were signs of STRANGULATION.
If you stop projecting and look at the photo you will notice no strangulation marks on her neck!
Also, how many cases have there been of an owl killing a human being?
The Owl didnt kill her. It caused as series of events that led to her death.
– an attack on Mrs. Peterson outside her residence by a wild bird of prey, given the fact of two droplets on the outside brick walk-way (Kent Street entrance to the house) (see police video tape of homicide scene),
– her subsequent return to the interior of the house,
– her loss of consciousness from shock and pain (exacerbated by alcohol and prescription medicine),
– a subsequent recovery of consciousness,
– a fall, caused by slipping in a massive amount of blood pooled around her,
– a second loss of consciousness, due to striking her head on the molding of the staircase.
You mentioned 'small feathers'? There was one feather and it was microscopic. Had an owl been tangled in her hair, there would have been more than one 'microscopic' feather and if such an attack happened outside, why didn't Peterson hear her scream?
There was a total of three feathers found. One was recorded early in the investigation and another two were found years later when they looked into the owl theory.
As for coincidences
Fact - Owls have two tri pronged set of talons
Fact - Kathleen Peterson had two tri pronged marks on the back of her head same size of an owls
Fact - Kathleen Peterson had microscopic owl feathers on her (One had her BLOOD on it)
Fact - Owls are the ONLY birds of prey that have microscopic feathers on thier talons
Fact - Kathleen Peterson had a small piece of tree bark in her hair
Fact - Owls live in trees
Fact - Kathleen Peterson was attacked at night
Fact - Owls come out an night
Fact - Owls lived were they lived and had attacked people before.
So yes Caroline, I dont believe in coincidences.