Author Topic: Discrepancy Of The Stomach Contents  (Read 88 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6072
Discrepancy Of The Stomach Contents
« on: June 28, 2018, 04:33:PM »
On the day of the murders Vanezis states that Sheila's stomach had partially digested food.

Some 30 years later he explains to CAL that this was actually for all the victims.

"Her stomach contained ‘partially digested food’.22 Vanezis made no reference to the stomach contents of the other victims, leading to speculation that Sheila might have eaten later than her family. ‘I’m sure they all had some food in their stomachs – I noted it for her and took it as read with the others.’"





However Vanezis did not carry out the autopsy's on June or the Twins until the following day (the 8th). In other words Vanezis is saying he somehow knew everyone's stomach contents before he even began to examine them. And writes this finding down on a sheet of paper that exclusively describes Sheila Caffell.



If they all had some food in their stomachs as Vanezis tells CAL. Then were are the reference's to these stomach contents of Nevill, June and the Twins? There seems to be only be one exhibit that consists of stomach contents and this belongs to none other than Sheila.




Were does this lead us?

The logical deduction is that there were no contents in the stomachs of the other four family members.
"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 39898
Re: Discrepancy Of The Stomach Contents
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2018, 05:19:PM »
And the logical answer will be that because " they all sat down to eat at the same time that naturally their stomach contents would have been present too "---------so you can't win !!

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6072
Re: Discrepancy Of The Stomach Contents
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2018, 11:04:PM »
And the logical answer will be that because " they all sat down to eat at the same time that naturally their stomach contents would have been present too "---------so you can't win !!

We know from the telephone conversation between June and Pam that Sheila had just gone upstairs to bed. This was after they all had dinner.

The stomach contents indicate that Sheila must have got out of bed later that night and got food from the kitchen. This is also where the rifle and amunition was left.


By the time the police entered the building. The rifle was upstairs with Sheila who also had no panties on. But there was a pair of bloody painties left in the kitchen.


Once again the pieces all fit together.



"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 22990
Re: Discrepancy Of The Stomach Contents
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2018, 11:08:PM »
On the day of the murders Vanezis states that Sheila's stomach had partially digested food.

Some 30 years later he explains to CAL that this was actually for all the victims.

"Her stomach contained ‘partially digested food’.22 Vanezis made no reference to the stomach contents of the other victims, leading to speculation that Sheila might have eaten later than her family. ‘I’m sure they all had some food in their stomachs – I noted it for her and took it as read with the others.’"





However Vanezis did not carry out the autopsy's on June or the Twins until the following day (the 8th). In other words Vanezis is saying he somehow knew everyone's stomach contents before he even began to examine them. And writes this finding down on a sheet of paper that exclusively describes Sheila Caffell.



If they all had some food in their stomachs as Vanezis tells CAL. Then were are the reference's to these stomach contents of Nevill, June and the Twins? There seems to be only be one exhibit that consists of stomach contents and this belongs to none other than Sheila.




Were does this lead us?

The logical deduction is that there were no contents in the stomachs of the other four family members.

No it doesn't - time of death and stomach contents were more important to deduce for Sheila because she was considered the perpetrator.
100% GUILTY - No doubts!

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 39898
Re: Discrepancy Of The Stomach Contents
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2018, 08:10:AM »
Unfortunately we have no time of death to refer to.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 22990
Re: Discrepancy Of The Stomach Contents
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2018, 09:49:AM »
We know from the telephone conversation between June and Pam that Sheila had just gone upstairs to bed. This was after they all had dinner.

The stomach contents indicate that Sheila must have got out of bed later that night and got food from the kitchen. This is also where the rifle and amunition was left.


By the time the police entered the building. The rifle was upstairs with Sheila who also had no panties on. But there was a pair of bloody painties left in the kitchen.


Once again the pieces all fit together.

It doesn't mean that at all - you're making them fit.
100% GUILTY - No doubts!