Author Topic: D. TAYLOR - tampered with ballistics prior to them being handed over to FLETCHER  (Read 3931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
A person by the name D. TAYLOR took control of the batches of Crime scene ammunitions, and tampered with some of it, prior to the involvement of Malcolm Fletcher. It is understood that 'he' it was who performed the so called 'unofficial' test firing of the anshuzt rifle, using 2 rounds from the batch of control ammunition from DRH/22, where he test fired one of the rounds via the anshuzt rifle with its silencer fitted, and the other control round via the same rifle, minus it's silencer...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Do you think ESSEX POLICE, had to source a 'baffle kit' from PARKER HALE, Birmingham when they realised the BAMBER silencer was 3 baffles short?

If so could a specialist in Metallurgy tell the '3' differed from the '14' baffles?
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 11:19:AM by Nigel »
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Do you think ESSEX POLICE, had to source a 'baffle kit' from PARKER HALE, Birmingham when they realised the BAMBER silencer was 3 baffles short?

If so could a specialist in Metallurgy tell the '3' differed from the '14' baffles?

A Silencer (DRB/1), Court Exhibit No.9, is still being retained at Essex Police's 'Black Museum', it (a) has 17 baffle plates, (b) a top washer, (c) an end cap, and (d) the outer tubing which encapsulated all of its inner workings...

There is more...

The silencer held at the local police museum, (DRB/1), Court Exhibit No.9, was supposedly exposed to fingerprinting by Superglue treatment (Cynoacrylate fumes) by Ron Cook, at Sandridge on the 23rd August 1985. What is interesting about this is that 'the blood group evidence' was 'not extracted' from inside 'one of the two silencers' (namely, 'DB/1', Lab' item No.23) until long after that date (12th September 1985), if we believe and or trust in the honesty and integrity of Essex police, and the local CPS, and the local Magistrates system, and the local judiciary, and the Police Complaints Authority, and anybody and everybody who has played some role or other in convicting this young man (Jeremy Bamber) of arguably the most henous of despicable crimes!!

Of course, knowing these facts presents something of a paradox, since the siulencer which was exhibited as the vehicle which contained Sheila Caffells unique blood group activity (A, EAP BA, AK1 and HP 2-1) could not possibly have been the silencer (DB//1, Lab' item No.23) submitted to the Lab' at Huntingdon on 30th August 1985, because Ann Eaton did not hand ijn the secondd silencer (DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9), until the 11th September 1985, andd thereafter, Essex police retained possesssion of that second silencer (DRB/1) until the 20th September 1985, and only then did they submit the second silencer to the lab' to be checked amongst other things for 'BLOOD'...

If Blood had already been found in the first silencer (DB/1, Lab' item No.23), which Essex police submitted to the LLab' at Huntingdon on 30th August 1985 (remember how Fletcher supposedly dismantled 'that silencer' at the Lab' on the 12th September 1985, and subsequently handed over the flake of dried blood he had found trapped inbetween the baffle plates of 'that Silencer', so that thye blood expert, John Hayward, could go about undertaking his expert analysis of the originas from whence the blood inj question had originated from, which he did in an exercise spanning several days (12th, 13th, 18th, and the 19th September 1985) - how utter amazing that by that stage, the second silencer (DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9) had not yet even been submitted to the lab' at Huntingdon to be cheacked for anty blood.....


We can now know and say that the blood group activity which has been allocated to having originated uniquely from Sheila Caffell, was definattely not found trapped between the baffle plates of Silencer 'DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9! We can work this out because only the other silencer (DB/1, Lab' item No.23) was present at Huntingdon Lab', it would be impossible for Sheila's blood to have been found inside the second silencer to which it has subsequently become allocated, primarily because the second silencer was still in the possession of Essex police, at the time Sheila's blood was supposedly found inside it...

We can be satisfied, therefore, that Sheila's blood was never found inside the second silencer (DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9), and we can be equally reassured that it wasn't genuinely found inside the first silencer (DB/1, Lab' item No.23), and that this reference to Sheila's blood must have got something to do with the 'missing blood sample' taken from Sheila Caffells body during autopsy, which nobody appears to know anything about regarding what happenned to 'it' after it was officially taken from Sheila's body!!!

I do not consider myself to be a mug, who can easily be fobbed off with a series of pathetic explanations...

I have no doubt whatsoever that the missing blood sample that was taken from Sheila Caffells body during autopsy was / is the source of the blood group evidence relied upon by the crooked prosecution of Jeremy Bamber - a blood sample, simply does not go missing of its own accord...
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 08:24:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
D. Taylor - framed Jeremy Bamber, and mark my words, he will be brought to book, and when this happens, D. Taylor will break his own neck to ensure that those who encouraged him, and whom motivated him, to present a false ballistics case to help to convict Jeremy Bamber as the killer, will also be brought to their knees!!

Corrupt Cops, manipulating a somewhat corrupted Criminal Justice System!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
D. Taylor, has got an awful lot of questioning to answer for...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Those involved on and after 6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 are SCUM, SCUM of the Earth and unless they repent will BURN IN HELL FOR ETERNITY.

They are warned.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 08:48:PM by Nigel »
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
They waited 28 days FOR 'the tape' to be wiped clean.

They used the excuse that aforementioned taped was 'wiped clean after 28 days'

> 6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985

The TAPE and the proof NEVILL made the call to ESSEX POLICE, deleted by corrupt ESSEX POLICE 1985.

BUT THERE IN THE 6.00pm on Friday 6th September 1985 REPORT, IS THE PROOF THAT NEVILL MADE THAT PHONE CALL

JEREMY is 100% innocent.

I PUT MY LIFE ON THIS.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 02:50:PM by Nigel »
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
D. Taylor, has got an awful lot of questioning to answer for...

D. Taylor was a very popular firearms expert, who not only worked behind the scene as part of the Essex police  campaign to turn the investigation into a one gun crime from September 1985, onward, but he also appears to have been the expert to whom the COLP Enquiry turned to in 1991 / 1992, in order to exclude the 10 bullets, or pieces of bullet, which were not positively matched to the anshuzt rifle in Malcolm Fletchers reports!

By the time COLP re-engaged Taylor as the expert who would report that none of the 10 unassociated bullets to the anshuzt rifle, also could not have been fired by way of Anthony Pargeters .22 Bruno bolt action rifle, Taylor was given the opportunity to put right, the mistakes he had made in September 1985...

In 1985, some 14 /15 spent cartridge cases had been switched in the batch of crime scene ammunition, for example, ones which had been loaded, fired, extracted and manually ejected from the Brno rifle, were replaced by 14 / 15 spent cases which had been loaded, fired, extracted and ejected via the anshuzt rifle during unofficial test firing of control ammunition, in order so that Malcolm Fletcher could link all of the 25 recovered bullet casings, as having been loaded, fired, and extracted by way of the semi-automatic anshuzt rifle during the shootings - yet, only 15 of the actual crime scene bullets were positively linked or associated with the anshuzt rifle...

No scientific evidence was available to (a) link the 25 bullets to the 25 bullet cases, (b) the propellant inside the rims of the casings were not matched to traces of propellant found around the bases of the 25 bullets, (c), there were no matching crimping marks showing where the round had been put together during the manufacturing procedure, and (d) none of the blood found on any of the bullets were matched as having originated from any of the 5 victims!

By the time D. Taylor got around to helping COLP to keep the police investigation as a one gun crime, no doubt he was able to smooth over these inconsistencies by the introduction of yet still more ammunition, ammunition which had not been loaded into, fired, extracted and ejected from Anthony Pargeters Brno Rifle, so not surprisingly, the newly transformed batch of crime scene ammunition consisting of 10 bullets, all of which could not be associated with the anshuzt rifle, as part of Fletcher's analysis, could also not be associated with the Pargeter rifle, either!
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 07:59:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
D. Taylor was 'in on the frame up' at the beginning, and 'the cover up' by 1991 / 1992...
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 08:02:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
D. Taylor was 'in on the frame up' at the beginning, and 'the cover up' by 1991 / 1992...
(a) The batch of crime scene ammunition compromising of 25 fired bullets, and 25 spent cartridge cases, which were actually recovered from the bodies of victims during autopsy, or loosely at the crime scene, or as the case may be, from the crime scene, were not the same bullets and spent cartridge cases to which Malcolm Fletcher completed a report about, where he linked all 25 spent cartridge cases and 15 of the 25 bullets, as having been loaded into the ammunition magazine of the anshuzt semi-automatic anshuzt rifle, fired, extracted, then ejected from 'it' during the shootings!

At the time of Fletcher's analysis, it was very misleading for him to suggest that Sheila Caffell's death, and moreover, the other four deaths had been determined by use of a solitary firearm, one silencer, and one batch of control ammunition from DRH/22, because of a total absence of any scientific evidence to link all of the 25 bullet casings, to all 25 of the so called 'Crime Scene bullets'...

No scientific or ballistic evidence, therefore, existed to confirm that the anshuzt rifle had fired all all of the 25 /26 shots fired, or discharged in the shooting incident, where albeit that there was an inconsistency, between 10 of the 25 bullets which had been fired, for one reason or another, not capable of being associated whatsoever with use of the anshuzt rifle, still remains somewhat problematic, to the case that was relied upon to prosecute Jeremy Bamber

You can see how D. Taylor set about trying to bamboozle the anyone trying to take an interest in this feature of the evidence!

I have said 'it' before and I will saying again...

'THE BALLISTICS ARE WRONG', in this prosecution, nothing adds up, there were only 9  Eley .22 Subsonic hollow point rounds of ammunition fired during the entire shootings from start to finish, the rest of the crime scene batch of ammunition belonged to Anthony Pargeters stash of .22 Ammunition that he was licensed to keep and use at whf..

There were no conditions on his firearms certificate to enable Anthony Pargeter to remove his rifle from the scene on the penultimate week-end, before the tragedy occurred!
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 08:35:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Seems somewhat relevant to me, that D. Taylor was given the responsibility of switching the unwanted spent cartridge cases (there could have been as many as 14 / 15 of these) which prior to Fletcher's report being ( remember exhibit 'MDF/100') compiled..

MDF/100 compromises of 14 spent cartridge cases which must bear the magazine markings, the firing pin mark, the extraction and the ejection marks, from Anthony Pargeters .22 Brno bolt- action rifle..
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 08:44:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The way I see it...

The batch of 25 'bullets', and the 25 'spent Cartridges', at the time D. Taylor tampered with them, were not the same batch of 25 bullets, and the 25 spent cartridge cases analysed by Malcolm Fletcher - D. Taylor had substituted some pieces from the original batch of crime scene ammunition, replacing at least 14, but possibly 15 of the originals (spent cartridge cases), with test fired control rounds before Fletcher produced his report, and at Least one bullet (he swapped over the original piece of bullet bearing the exhibit mark 'PV/20'?

As a result of these deceptions, Fletcher concluded that all 25 bullets which had been fired during the incident, had been fired via the anshuzt rifle!!!

Then in 1991, when the COLP investigators were looking into the matters raised by 'yours truly' to the then Home Secretary, Mr David Waddington, the batch of crime scene ammunition had to be switched again, and involved on this occasion the swapping over of 10 bullets, with another 10 bullets fired from another gun, other than the anshuzt semi-automatic rifle, and the .22 bolt action rifle..!
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 09:20:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The way I see it...

The batch of 25 'bullets', and the 25 'spent Cartridges', at the time D. Taylor tampered with them, were not the same batch of 25 bullets, and the 25 spent cartridge cases analysed by Malcolm Fletcher - D. Taylor had substituted some pieces from the original batch of crime scene ammunition, replacing at least 14, but possibly 15 of the originals (spent cartridge cases), with test fired control rounds before Fletcher produced his report, and at Least one bullet (he swapped over the original piece of bullet bearing the exhibit mark 'PV/20'?

As a result of these deceptions, Fletcher concluded that all 25 bullets which had been fired during the incident, had been fired via the anshuzt rifle!!!

Then in 1991, when the COLP investigators were looking into the matters raised by 'yours truly' to the then Home Secretary, Mr David Waddington, the batch of crime scene ammunition had to be switched again, and involved on this occasion the swapping over of 10 bullets, with another 10 bullets fired from another gun, other than the anshuzt semi-automatic rifle, and the .22 bolt action rifle..!
As a result, D. Taylor was able to conclude, that the 10 bullets, or pieces of a bullet identified by myself as originating from the use of the .22 bolt action rifle at the time of the shootings, could not be associated to the bolt action rifle! Soon after, COLP arranged for D. Taylor to produce his ballistics report excluding the possible use of the bolt action rifle in the shootings, the batch of crime scene ammunition was effectively destroyed!

No guesses for why?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
What is also known, was that Special Branch were very upset that Anthony Pargeters .22 bolt action rifle, had been seized, and was to be examined by a ballistic expert to see if it could have fired 10 of the 25 bullets subject of the shooting tragedy..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
What is also known, was that Special Branch were very upset that Anthony Pargeters .22 bolt action rifle, had been seized, and was to be examined by a ballistic expert to see if it could have fired 10 of the 25 bullets subject of the shooting tragedy..

I have a copy of an internal letter somewhere, inwhich a Brigadier Powell is going ballistic that Anthony Pargeters bolt action rifle is being looked at as part of Jeremy Bambers complaints, concerning it's possible use in the shooting tragedy!!
« Last Edit: May 27, 2018, 09:37:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...