Do you think ESSEX POLICE, had to source a 'baffle kit' from PARKER HALE, Birmingham when they realised the BAMBER silencer was 3 baffles short?
If so could a specialist in Metallurgy tell the '3' differed from the '14' baffles?
A Silencer (DRB/1), Court Exhibit No.9, is still being retained at Essex Police's 'Black Museum', it (a) has 17 baffle plates, (b) a top washer, (c) an end cap, and (d) the outer tubing which encapsulated all of its inner workings...
There is more...
The silencer held at the local police museum, (DRB/1), Court Exhibit No.9, was supposedly exposed to fingerprinting by Superglue treatment (Cynoacrylate fumes) by Ron Cook, at Sandridge on the 23rd August 1985. What is interesting about this is that 'the blood group evidence' was 'not extracted' from inside 'one of the two silencers' (namely, 'DB/1', Lab' item No.23) until long after that date (12th September 1985), if we believe and or trust in the honesty and integrity of Essex police, and the local CPS, and the local Magistrates system, and the local judiciary, and the Police Complaints Authority, and anybody and everybody who has played some role or other in convicting this young man (Jeremy Bamber) of arguably the most henous of despicable crimes!!
Of course, knowing these facts presents something of a paradox, since the siulencer which was exhibited as the vehicle which contained Sheila Caffells unique blood group activity (A, EAP BA, AK1 and HP 2-1) could not possibly have been the silencer (DB//1, Lab' item No.23) submitted to the Lab' at Huntingdon on 30th August 1985, because Ann Eaton did not hand ijn the secondd silencer (DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9), until the 11th September 1985, andd thereafter, Essex police retained possesssion of that second silencer (DRB/1) until the 20th September 1985, and only then did they submit the second silencer to the lab' to be checked amongst other things for 'BLOOD'...
If Blood had already been found in the first silencer (DB/1, Lab' item No.23), which Essex police submitted to the LLab' at Huntingdon on 30th August 1985 (remember how Fletcher supposedly dismantled 'that silencer' at the Lab' on the 12th September 1985, and subsequently handed over the flake of dried blood he had found trapped inbetween the baffle plates of 'that Silencer', so that thye blood expert, John Hayward, could go about undertaking his expert analysis of the originas from whence the blood inj question had originated from, which he did in an exercise spanning several days (12th, 13th, 18th, and the 19th September 1985) - how utter amazing that by that stage, the second silencer (DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9) had not yet even been submitted to the lab' at Huntingdon to be cheacked for anty blood.....
We can now know and say that the blood group activity which has been allocated to having originated uniquely from Sheila Caffell, was definattely not found trapped between the baffle plates of Silencer 'DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9! We can work this out because only the other silencer (DB/1, Lab' item No.23) was present at Huntingdon Lab', it would be impossible for Sheila's blood to have been found inside the second silencer to which it has subsequently become allocated, primarily because the second silencer was still in the possession of Essex police, at the time Sheila's blood was supposedly found inside it...
We can be satisfied, therefore, that Sheila's blood was never found inside the second silencer (DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9), and we can be equally reassured that it wasn't genuinely found inside the first silencer (DB/1, Lab' item No.23), and that this reference to Sheila's blood must have got something to do with the 'missing blood sample' taken from Sheila Caffells body during autopsy, which nobody appears to know anything about regarding what happenned to 'it' after it was officially taken from Sheila's body!!!
I do not consider myself to be a mug, who can easily be fobbed off with a series of pathetic explanations...
I have no doubt whatsoever that the missing blood sample that was taken from Sheila Caffells body during autopsy was / is the source of the blood group evidence relied upon by the crooked prosecution of Jeremy Bamber - a blood sample, simply does not go missing of its own accord...