Author Topic: if it wasnt about money.  (Read 2958 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15243
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
if it wasnt about money.
« on: October 17, 2017, 03:53:PM »
rwb stated clearly that his motive for doing what he did wasnt money.

now if thats true why does ap need to take him to court for his share of neviles cash why doesnt rwb just give it to him.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43472
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2017, 04:12:PM »
That would have been a question best avoided I think. ;)

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15243
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2017, 04:17:PM »
well its not the actions who isnt intrested in neviles money.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2017, 05:54:PM »
rwb stated clearly that his motive for doing what he did wasnt money.

now if thats true why does ap need to take him to court for his share of neviles cash why doesnt rwb just give it to him.

It wasn't technically RB's money, it was Pamela's money.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 29625
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2017, 06:16:PM »
It wasn't technically RB's money, it was Pamela's money.

That's a very valid point. It reminds me that it was the Speakmans, rather than the Boutflours, who held the wealth. They were the business people, the Boutflours, I believe, were academics. It's pushed that RWB was the one who pulled the strings, but it was Pam who held the purse strings. It can, of course, be argued that Pam gave him free rein, but it's only conjecture.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15243
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2017, 06:21:PM »
but we are not talking about the entire  speaking estatewe just talking nevile share and of course neviles own estate.

pam would of still had a fair share of the money so this is funny behavior for people who say there not concerned about money.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2017, 06:53:PM by nugnug »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43472
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2017, 06:34:PM »
Didn't Pamela say she hadn't wanted the money ? Therefore RWB would have " taken charge ".

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 29625
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2017, 06:35:PM »
Didn't Pamela say she hadn't wanted the money ? Therefore RWB would have " taken charge ".

I thought she divided it between David and Ann.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2017, 06:41:PM »
but we are not talking about the entire we just talking nevile share and of course neviles own estate.

pam would of still had a fair share of the money so this is funny behavior for people who say there not concerned about money.

I don't know why it took the threat of a court case to make Pamela give up Nevill's estate.

It would have been great if the money had gone to charity and then none of them would have had it.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43472
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2017, 06:42:PM »
I thought she divided it between David and Ann.






AP had been missed out though and Pamela wouldn't have let that happen.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 29625
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2017, 06:49:PM »





AP had been missed out though and Pamela wouldn't have let that happen.

AP wasn't Pam's family. He was a product of the distaff side of Nevill's family.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43472
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2017, 06:53:PM »
AP wasn't Pam's family. He was a product of the distaff side of Nevill's family.






Even so,he was still more a part of the family than Sheila or Jeremy had been.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15243
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2017, 06:54:PM »
I don't know why it took the threat of a court case to make Pamela give up Nevill's estate.

It would have been great if the money had gone to charity and then none of them would have had it.

well as they allready had all of speakmen estate the dident really need neviles as well that was just pure greed.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2017, 06:56:PM »
well as they allready had all of speakmen estate the dident really need neviles as well that was just pure greed.

I've never understood why Nevill's estate was awarded to Pamela anyway.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12206
Re: if it wasnt about money.
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2017, 07:00:PM »
I've never understood why Nevill's estate was awarded to Pamela anyway.
Because Nevill's intentions post-mortem were that his wife should inherit. All this talk of commorientes yesterday overlooked the fact of the wishes of the people concerned.