Re Dalagher, Vanezis went some considerable way towards corroborating the other expert. If he said it was 'highly likely' then he was wrong - because the wrong lad did 7 years for it! Ergo, despite the judge's caveat, Vanezis effectively provided 'expert' testimony that assisted police in banging-up the wrong person. Hardly unblemished is he?
I'm not an epidermal expert but I do have eyeballs and the associated vision. Some people really should do themselves a favour and stop making out that 'bloodstaining' in and of itself contains properties that causes cuts, grazes and indentations upon human skin. This case is big enough for any number of 'researchers' to discover anomalies that increasingly point towards Sheila and away from Jeremy. It shouldn't be some kind of ego competition between competing fields - 'ooh my discovery is better than your discovery' etc.
And using the term 'conspiracy' is just some cheap generic dig - water off a duck's back tbh. Are we supposed to believe that Jeremy's conviction happened purely by accident, as a result of police and professionals carrying out their duties either without due diligence or making errors along the way? Or is it more likely that in a deliberate attempt to achieve a desired outcome - the police handled different witnesses (professional and otherwise) using a variety of techniques? Some they cajoled or coached; some they tricked (like Colin's statement); some they appealed to; some they induced; some they pressurised; some they told fibs to; and to some they didn't have to do much at all... we know which ones they were don't we?
As for Vanezis 'overlooking' minor wounds - I deny ever having claimed this. Instead, I believe that regarding the fight wounds, at some point he was persuaded to cooperate with Ainsley and DS Jones (who we know began to court him). The apparent opposing factor to this, is the handwritten notes which are supposedly the PM. I do not know how complete these notes have survived. However in this case for me personally, to paraphrase the CCRC - 'crime scene images represent stronger evidence than notes'.