FORUM SPATS

[Jane]

Ex member.

Question again, I'm afraid, but I have little -NO- knowledge of how these things work. How can an EX member have access to your pm page?

[lookout]

I concur that Caroline and I will challenge everything you say that we believe the FACTS to be wrong. We both have the qualifications to KNOW when it's wrong. I have my notes and books that I can refer to and I'm lucky enough to know people I can ask for verification, PLUS I'm more than ready to admit if I don't know something or if I've made a mistake. I see no shame in it. How else does one learn? Kaldin held threads to ransom for hours over things which ware no more than the opinion they CHOSE to apply to it. My feeling is that whatever Caroline and I said, they'd have said exactly the opposite. The result was boring and highly unintelligent bickering rather than solid debate.

Your agreeing with anyone is now as rare as hens teeth so others are naturally going to pick up on this so what else do you expect other than an approach of trepidation,questioning and generally being " held to ransom  ? You've brought it on yourselves is all I can say------------tit for tat.

Erm-----------qualifications for what ?

[lookout]

Question again, I'm afraid, but I have little -NO- knowledge of how these things work. How can an EX member have access to your pm page?

Doesn't have to be a pm does it ?

[Jane]

Your agreeing with anyone is now as rare as hens teeth so others are naturally going to pick up on this so what else do you expect other than an approach of trepidation,questioning and generally being " held to ransom  ? You've brought it on yourselves is all I can say------------tit for tat.

Erm-----------qualifications for what ?

There was no "trepidation" on Kaldin's part, Lookout. As they said to Caroline "I'm not a shrinking violet" and if you read through their posts, you'll see this for yourself. I've witnessed nothing of the "shrinking violet" OR "trepidation" from either you, Jackie, or any other supporters, but from how you claim we've "bought it on yourselves" and that it was "tit for tat" it makes me wonder whether there may have been some collaboration?

Qualifications to challenge you when you've got it wrong and won't back down.

[Jane]

Doesn't have to be a pm does it ?

Then surely they must have your personal details. Why would you give your personal details out, AND are they telling you to "leave the forum" as a threat, OR are you telling them that you believe yourself to be under attack by those nasty guilters, ie Caroline and me, and they're telling you not to put up with it, and you should "leave the forum"?

[JackieD]

I haven't seen any sexual harassment ?? And I certainly wouldn't condone it if I saw it, and to involve others by surmising they'd say " bring it on " is beyond reproach.

Ditto

[JackieD]

But you're not on the receiving end of it, are you? If you care to read his last side swipe ate me you won't fail to miss its sexual connotation, although, from the way you've upheld comments from certain other quarters -and it's OK, I'm not pointing a finger at something I've probably done myself- you may not think it's important. I can assure you that, publicly, bringing another person's sexuality into question. is entirely UNACCEPTABLE.

How do you expect to be treated with your vile behaviour, you are not in the slightest bit interested in the truth

[JackieD]

Qualifications
What a joke, you can hardly string a sentence together and cannot do a single post without abuse
The trouble is Kaldin is far to intelligent for the two of you
He had you running around in circles

[Stephanie]

Qualifications
What a joke, you can hardly string a sentence together and cannot do a single post without abuse
The trouble is Kaldin is far to intelligent for the two of you
He had you running around in circles

Projection

[JackieD]

Your agreeing with anyone is now as rare as hens teeth so others are naturally going to pick up on this so what else do you expect other than an approach of trepidation,questioning and generally being " held to ransom  ? You've brought it on yourselves is all I can say------------tit for tat.

Erm-----------qualifications for what ?


Exactly Lookout  how funny

[Stephanie]

Qualifications
What a joke, you can hardly string a sentence together and cannot do a single post without abuse
The trouble is Kaldin is far to intelligent for the two of you
He had you running around in circles

Kaldin may turn out to be a she for all we know.

[JackieD]

There was no "trepidation" on Kaldin's part, Lookout. As they said to Caroline "I'm not a shrinking violet" and if you read through their posts, you'll see this for yourself. I've witnessed nothing of the "shrinking violet" OR "trepidation" from either you, Jackie, or any other supporters, but from how you claim we've "bought it on yourselves" and that it was "tit for tat" it makes me wonder whether there may have been some collaboration?

Qualifications to challenge you when you've got it wrong and won't back down.

Collaboration, you are really sick, we don't pm each other every 2 minutes and we don't sit on a forum 24/7 you are the saddest person I have ever come across
No life and bitter

[JackieD]

Kaldin may turn out to be a she for all we know.

Who cares we all love Kaldin we have always way before you ever came on here

All the genuine people love Kaldin to bits

[JackieD]

Photos of me?

Unflattering?

Steph truly they are dreadful

[Stephanie]

Who cares we all love Kaldin we have always way before you ever came on here

All the genuine people love Kaldin to bits

Sounds to me like Kaldin has some self esteem issues going on