Why wasn't crispy shot?

[guest2181]

He does not see them all - only ones that certain people want him to see.

Sounds catty.

[Kaldin]

Well yes, I understand what such a test might identify, however, what I meant was, the absence or presence of blood in this instance wouldn't have had any impact on the investigation, so why would they bother conducting such a test?

Well yes, but much has been made of the absence of blood on Sheila's palms or fingers on here, although I'm not sure why.

I suppose it could have told them something - if anyone else's blood was on her hands, or if her own blood was on the palms, it might have had some bearing on what happened.

[guest2181]

Well yes, but much has been made of the absence of blood on Sheila's palms or fingers on here, although I'm not sure why.

I suppose it could have told them something - if anyone else's blood was on her hands, or if her own blood was on the palms, it might have had some bearing on what happened.

I suppose so, maybe they did do such a test, I don't know.

[ngb1066]

Sounds catty.

It can be.  There was one member here who never posted but came onto the forum in order to print off posts and send them to JB.  He was selecting posts and threads which he knew would wind JB up and he was not presenting a fair overall view of forum debate.  Eventually he was challenged and then banned.

[lookout]

I'll never understand how people can do things like that.

[guest2181]

I'll never understand how people can do things like that.

Yeah, it's a bit strange.

[Caroline]

That seems unlikely. 

I was going to say that 

[Caroline]

I've reread Elliot's statements and court evidence.

There is no mention of testing for blood, only for metals. Whether Sheila's hands were blood stained, or not, doesn't appear to have any impact on the swabs.

I didn't mean that they would be tested for blood but if her hands were blood stained, the swabs would have blood on them - visible to the naked eye. Although it does seem strange that they didn't test for blood.

[David1819]

No he can't, but he is sent print offs of posts.

by who?

He cant surely get every-post. The prisons staff would not bother going through it all to pass it on to him

[guest2181]

I didn't mean that they would be tested for blood but if her hands were blood stained, the swabs would have blood on them - visible to the naked eye. Although it does seem strange that they didn't test for blood.

Maybe the swabs did have blood on them.

I can't help but think that this might just be an attempt to dismiss the swab evidence. The results of the tests for the presence of lead  reported on by Elliot, are quite a hurdle.

[ngb1066]

by who?

He cant surely get every-post. The prisons staff would not bother going through it all to pass it on to him

See my posts above.

[David1819]

See my posts above.

How did you know what he was printing? 

[ngb1066]

How did you know what he was printing? 

I was told by a very reliable source. 

[guest2181]

I was told by a very reliable source. 

Probably had the user name at the top of each sheet also.

[ngb1066]

Probably had the user name at the top of each sheet also.

I imagine so.