Author Topic: scott peterson.  (Read 1004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14617
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #30 on: August 10, 2019, 03:45:PM »
i would a dog that had seen somthing bad happen to its owener would show sighns of it it would be upset but the dog seemed perfectly happy that would indicate hatt stacy was not atacked while walking the dog.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6747
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #31 on: August 10, 2019, 06:18:PM »
i would a dog that had seen somthing bad happen to its owener would show sighns of it it would be upset but the dog seemed perfectly happy that would indicate hatt stacy was not atacked while walking the dog.

Yeah.

All his supporters just seem to be women that send him love letters. Over on IA its the same bunch of women spreading misinformation. No credible arguments.
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10890
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #32 on: August 11, 2019, 10:48:PM »
i would a dog that had seen somthing bad happen to its owener would show sighns of it it would be upset but the dog seemed perfectly happy that would indicate hatt stacy was not atacked while walking the dog.
But the husband is not going to attack his wife in full view as she's walking the dog in the park. The indentation on the bed suggested that she had been smothered there, as did the fractured ribs which occurred perimortem.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14617
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #33 on: August 11, 2019, 10:58:PM »
But the husband is not going to attack his wife in full view as she's walking the dog in the park. The indentation on the bed suggested that she had been smothered there, as did the fractured ribs which occurred perimortem.

its scotts contention that stacy was going to walk the dog and somthing happend to her while she was doing that after he had left.

the dog was found running loose by the woman living next door to scott the proscution contend scott let the dog out himself.

im inclined to agrea withthem i cant be certan of guilt but the evdence seems to point strongly towards it.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2019, 10:23:AM by nugnug »

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6747
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #34 on: August 11, 2019, 11:11:PM »
He was on TV appealing for her to come home or witnesses to come forward ect ect. All while he was selling off her Jewelry on Ebay.

The inference can be drawn that he knew she was dead and never coming home.
"A theory without facts is fantasy"

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14617
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #35 on: August 12, 2019, 10:06:PM »
theres more about it here it doesnt seem that clear cut.

http://www.pwc-sii.com/CourtDocs/Exhibits/D-N.pdf