Author Topic: scott peterson.  (Read 1149 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
scott peterson.
« on: September 15, 2017, 12:11:AM »
i allways thought he was guilty as hell but now I'm not so sure.

https://youtu.be/ePQgg6odPtQ

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11000
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2017, 08:11:PM »
i allways thought he was guilty as hell but now I'm not so sure.

https://youtu.be/ePQgg6odPtQ
It looks like an open and shut case to me, with echoes from Mark Lundy, Jeremy Bamber and Paula Gilfoyle running through my mind.  https://youtu.be/3XNFCE6lkv0
« Last Edit: September 15, 2017, 08:14:PM by Steve_uk »

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2017, 08:17:PM »
well thers a bit more then the clip ive just posted yes on the face of it certainly looked like that but thres a bit more to it.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2017, 08:24:PM by nugnug »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11000
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2017, 08:21:PM »
well thers a bit more then the clip ive just posted yes on the face of it certainly looked but thres a bit more to it.
Well can you point me to it because I've sat through the 40 minutes and the only thing the Defence seemed to have is that Laci knew her husband had bought a boat.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2017, 08:21:PM by Steve_uk »

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11000
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2017, 09:12:PM »
here.

http://people.com/crime/laci-peterson-murder-was-evidence-lost-that-points-to-scotts-innocence/
Well I've learned not to underestimate you after you reminded me the suicide notes in the Eddie Gilfoyle case weren't adduced in court. There's a woman here who claims Peterson had confessed to her. I don't know enough about this case to know whether he could have killed her at a later time.  http://www.modbee.com/news/local/article3099445.html

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2017, 09:21:PM »
well at first I thought they new witness miht of just been mistaken and it was somebody else they say walking a dog but to many have come forward now to make that really credible.

unless theres another woman who looks a lot like lacy and has the same dog.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7177
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2017, 05:34:AM »
Its always been a flimsy conviction based on a few strands of circumstantial evidence.

- He spoke of his wife in the past tense before she was confirmed dead.

- He told a girlfriend he lost his wife (before she went missing).

- He sold some of his wife's belongings before while she was missing and not confirmed dead.

Lousy evidence because there was no physical evidence. I keep an open mind.

http://www.alluc.ee/l/the-murder-of-laci-peterson-s01e04-the-trial-begins-480p-web-dl-x264-rmteam-mp4/aaplluek

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2017, 10:55:AM »
i thought he was guilty just becouse the body was found at sea and he was on a boat that day but i cant see all these witness who say the saw his wife walking the dog could be wrong and theyve got no reason to lie.

i mean 1 or 2 could be mistaken but 33 i dont think they could of all got it wrong.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2017, 10:56:AM by nugnug »

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2017, 01:05:PM »
acording to the police witness sightings were not a priority

funny thing to say in a missing persons case.

http://www.scottpetersonappeal.org/

Offline JackieD

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 998
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2017, 08:56:PM »
i allways thought he was guilty as hell but now I'm not so sure.

https://youtu.be/ePQgg6odPtQ

I have followed this case for ages Nugs

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2017, 09:04:PM »
i thought he did it just becouse and he was on aboat that day and the body was found at sea. but now it seems more or less impossble to have actully done the deed.

so unless they can prove the exitence of a hitman he really should be released.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2017, 10:10:PM by nugnug »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11000
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2017, 09:58:PM »
i thought he did it just becouse and he was on aboat that day but now it seems more or less impossble to have actully done the deed.

so unless they can prove the exitence of a hitman he really should be released.
I think this is the classic love triangle: no more, no less. http://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/scott-peterson-amber-frey-murder-142327

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14876
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2017, 10:30:PM »
i thought a bit odd to want to go fishing on christmass eve. but i cant really declare somone guilty of murder becouse of it.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11000
Re: scott peterson.
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2017, 10:40:PM »
i thought a bit odd to want to go fishing on christmass eve. but i cant really declare somone guilty of murder becouse of it.
But the body was found within two miles of where he was fishing. Given the vastness of the USA's waters I would have thought that was enough proof combined with the other circumstantial evidence.