0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If anybody doesn't agree with him then two things happen.Firstly, they place themselves in opposition to the pathologist's findings expressed at trial (obviously). Secondly, they are faced with solving the question at the beginning of this thread.
I don't agree with him.
He claimed at trial that the darker spots were at the end of the runs of blood. Not the beginning.
I agree with him.
That they hadn't run any further because her life had ended ?I still say that the dark spots came from the jugular vein,which is darker blood anyway than that from an artery.
It wasn't photographed as it had happened------on the carpet. No blood beneath to give any clues ?
So if the photos show the end of the trails you are agreeing that the beginning is on the other side of the arm that we can not see?
I think the trails are from her hand. I think Bamber made the palm print on the bible from blood on her hand, placed the bible on her lap leaving the stain of bloodied finger marks on her nightdress, which ended in a straight line (because of the bible). I think it thought it looked too staged and he wouldn't have been able to stage the rifle. I think he changed his mind and put the bible on the floor - upturned.
I was talking about the trails that go around her arms in several places . Are you talking about the same thing?