Author Topic: The rifle in the window.  (Read 21932 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #375 on: July 18, 2017, 10:21:PM »
This was why cops sought to deliberately withhold and conceal photographs, all 358 of them which were taken by DC Oakey and DC Henderson whilst senior officers tampered with the bodies of June and Sheila during 'informatives' between 9 am and 10am. Cook, Bird, Davidson and Hammersley (second team of SOC) took over the role of recording the crime scene once senior officers had staged Sheila's and Junes death scenes in the main bedroom...

Essex police and the CPS hid the fact that there were two different SOC teams operating at the scene on that first morning of the investigation! They presented the role of the second SOC team consisting of Cook, Bird, Davidson and Hammersley, as though they were the only SOC present at the scene, and that they recorded the various crime scenes inside the farmhouse as though undisturbed, from two and a half hours previously! But what Cook, Bird, Davidson and Hammersley recorded was the staged crime scene, staged by senior officers during aforementioned 'informatives'! The complete set of photographs taken by PC Bird were faked by senior officers, and they even got PC Bird to create false photographic records, by getting him to create an imaginary 'THE MASTER COPY ALBUM', which was far from being a master copy, it not including 358 key photographs each capable individually and collectively of proving cops staged the bodies of June and Sheila on the bedroom floor after their bodies had been on top of the bed!

If what I am revealing ever gets the case back to the court of appeal, Bambers convictions will automatically get quashed because the cops and the CPS prosecuted and convicted Jeremy Bamber by a reliance on crime scene photographs which purported to show the bodies of victims undisturbed, when what the court photographs actually portrayed Were staged death scenes, in particular, the death of Sheila Caffell was staged by cops to promote the suggestion that she had shot and killed herself by shooting herself twice with the family owned rifle, when if the truth be known she was only shot once with that gun (bullet, PV/19)! Cops were so cock sure of getting away with killing Sheila Caffell, that they didn't even bother to swap the original police round over and replace it with a test fired round fired in the family owned anshuzt rifle, until the relatives kicked up a stink and the case changed from being one of four murders and a suicide (Crime Reference no. SC/688/85), into five murders (Crime Reference no. SC/786/85) after the first week in September 1985. By that stage it was too late for cops to admit to what they had done! They would have got away with it if the matter had remained a Coroner's Court case, because a Coroner is only concerned with the cause of death, not whether as in Sheila's case, she took her own life, or not! She died as a result of gunshots to the neck and head (according to the death certificate)!


« Last Edit: July 18, 2017, 10:23:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #376 on: July 18, 2017, 11:18:PM »
358 missing photographs versus 223 photographs, will be a formidable ground of appeal in due course! The former taken by the first team of SOCO, DC Oakey and DC Henderson between 9am and 10am, whilst senior officers performed 'informatives', moving the bodies, removing items of evidential value, adding items of evidential value, and by 10am the death scenes of Sheila and June inside the main bedroom had been totally reset! Once senior officers were satisfied with staging these death scenes, only then we're the second team of SOCO, DI Cook, PC Bird, DS Davidson and DC Hammersley permitted into the farmhouse to record and gather exhibits from the revised crime scene - this is why it was after 10 am before this second team of SOCO were invited into the farmhouse to record the revised crime scenes in the kitchen and the main bedroom as though what they were recording was undisturbed death scenes involving Neville Bamber in the kitchen, and Sheila and June in the main bedroom..


"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #377 on: July 18, 2017, 11:44:PM »
358 missing photographs versus 223 photographs, will be a formidable ground of appeal in due course! The former taken by the first team of SOCO, DC Oakey and DC Henderson between 9am and 10am, whilst senior officers performed 'informatives', moving the bodies, removing items of evidential value, adding items of evidential value, and by 10am the death scenes of Sheila and June inside the main bedroom had been totally reset! Once senior officers were satisfied with staging these death scenes, only then we're the second team of SOCO, DI Cook, PC Bird, DS Davidson and DC Hammersley permitted into the farmhouse to record and gather exhibits from the revised crime scene - this is why it was after 10 am before this second team of SOCO were invited into the farmhouse to record the revised crime scenes in the kitchen and the main bedroom as though what they were recording was undisturbed death scenes involving Neville Bamber in the kitchen, and Sheila and June in the main bedroom..

I have studied the photographic schedules against PC Bird (SOCO) and DI 'Ron' Cooks (SOCO) trial evidence, and have uncovered a mountain of evidence which establishes that Bird and Cook deliberately misled the court which was trying the matter by claiming that PC Bird took photograph no. 23, after he had already photographed Sheila's body in the main bedroom, but he lied and lied! Cook claimed he moved Sheila's hand so that PC Bird could photograph bloodied fingermarks on the front lower right of her light blue nightdress! He also claimed it was him who removed the gun from Sheila"s body and after getting police inspector Montgomery to make it safe, how he had positioned the rifle at the main bedroom window where PC Bird photographed it as per photograph no. 23, but Cook lied, and lied, and lied!!
« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 12:47:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #378 on: July 19, 2017, 12:59:PM »
I have studied the photographic schedules against PC Bird (SOCO) and DI 'Ron' Cooks (SOCO) trial evidence, and have uncovered a mountain of evidence which establishes that Bird and Cook deliberately misled the court which was trying the matter by claiming that PC Bird took photograph no. 23, after he had already photographed Sheila's body in the main bedroom, but he lied and lied! Cook claimed he moved Sheila's hand so that PC Bird could photograph bloodied fingermarks on the front lower right of her light blue nightdress! He also claimed it was him who removed the gun from Sheila"s body and after getting police inspector Montgomery to make it safe, how he had positioned the rifle at the main bedroom window where PC Bird photographed it as per photograph no. 23, but Cook lied, and lied, and lied!!

How can it be proved that PC Bird (SOCO) and DI 'Ron' Cook (SOCO) lied and fabricated their testimony during Bambers October 1986, Chelmsford Crown Court trial, regarding who took photograph No. 23, and who actually moved Sheila Caffells right hand! PC bird did not take photograph no. 23, he is a pathological liar and criminal in uniform, and a conspirator! DC Henderson or DC Oakey took it, during the period 9am to 10am when senior officers performed 'informatives' , when they tampered with the crime scene in the main bedroom, and staged Sheila Caffells death scene! 'Ron' Cook was nobody but one of the many common criminals in uniform which exist! So too was PC Bird! There were others of course in this particular matter, including the unscrupulous and dishonest CPS (Adams, the dirty low life, CPS manager at the heart of the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice - these criminals in wigs and gowns cannot ever be prosecuted for fabricating evidence under the current Criminal justice system! They lie and even when exposed these vile individuals will never get prosecuted!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #379 on: July 19, 2017, 01:03:PM »
How can it be proved that PC Bird (SOCO) and DI 'Ron' Cook (SOCO) lied and fabricated their testimony during Bambers October 1986, Chelmsford Crown Court trial, regarding who took photograph No. 23, and who actually moved Sheila Caffells right hand! PC bird did not take photograph no. 23, he is a pathological liar and criminal in uniform, and a conspirator! DC Henderson or DC Oakey took it, during the period 9am to 10am when senior officers performed 'informatives' , when they tampered with the crime scene in the main bedroom, and staged Sheila Caffells death scene! 'Ron' Cook was nobody but one of the many common criminals in uniform which exist! So too was PC Bird! There were others of course in this particular matter, including the unscrupulous and dishonest CPS (Adams, the dirty low life, CPS manager at the heart of the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice - these criminals in wigs and gowns cannot ever be prosecuted for fabricating evidence under the current Criminal justice system! They lie and even when exposed these vile individuals will never get prosecuted!

so if this is the case then it would have been in their interests to cover up what they had done and keep the crime as murder suicide.

So was it just pressure from the family that made them change track ? I am sorry I just don't get this ?

so when other officers got involved could they not tell them what they had done in respect of moving the bodies?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #380 on: July 19, 2017, 01:04:PM »
 The way that I see it, these criminals in uniform who cannot be and never are or very rarely are prosecuted, or are very rarely prosecuted, are victims of the criminal justice system itself - the Chief Constable of the investigating force, the director of public Prosecutions, the Home Secretary, the Lord Chief Justice should all be prosecuted as conspirators in these wicked, evil, vile acts of officialdom corruption! Let's get everyone if these heads of departments in court, cgpharged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malfeance in public office, let's get one or other prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced for the criminal offences, and let these heads of department sort the chaff from the wheat!
« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 02:48:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #381 on: July 19, 2017, 01:34:PM »
so if this is the case then it would have been in their interests to cover up what they had done and keep the crime as murder suicide. it depends how you look at the problem! What you have got to try and remember, is that by the time the nature of the investigation altered, SC/688/85 into SC/786/85, a lot of water had already passed under the bridge! Cops had proceeded on the basis that Sheila had shot, struggled and killed the other four victims, añd then gone on to take her own life! The first part of this presentation was true and accurate, the second part was and is totally untrue and a lie! Since, Sheila did not shoot herself, or commit suicide on the main bedroom floor with the family owned anshuzt rifle! She was only shot once by a bullet (PV/19) fired by way of that weapon, this was according to police reports inflicted at 9.13am after Sheila's body was moved to the bedroom floor from on top of her parents bed! An officers report exists containing the reference no. 1612 which details how a firearms officers gun shot Sheila upon his entry to the kitchen at 7.35am! The contents of the timed police radio logs, and elsewhere, timed at 7.35am, 7.37am, 7.38am, 7.42am, 7.45am, and 8.10am, are all 100% true! Cops didn't have time to convict and fabricate their stories whilst contemporaneous messages were being relayed! There was definitely two bodies downstairs in the kitchen between 7.45am, and 8.10am, and only a further three bodies upstairs by 8.10am, making five dead in total. But this body count changed after the I troduction of Harris, Gibbons and  ontgo dry to the kitchen at around 8.15am, when to everyone's surprise and concern, only the body of Neville Bamber was present! Such was the dilemma cops found themselves in at around 8.15am, that it required direct communication between ACc Peter Simpson, and DCI 'George' Harris via use of the kitchen landline to sort out! A call which lasted some15 minutes,only terminated once Sheila's body had been relocated on top of the bed,in the main bedroom, shot only once by that stage, and more importantly with no rifle at all in Sheila's Cavell's possession,the rifle in question had been resting against a first floor box room window, at the time the police surgeon (8.44am) pronounced Sheila as being dead, she having only what appeared to be single gunshot wound to her neck by that stage!

So was it just pressure from the family that made them change track ? No, it wasn't just the pressure from relatives! It was the hole Essex police had dug itself into! They presented Sheila's death as a suicide, despite knowing this not to be true! Sheila did not shoot herself downstairs in the kitchen, with what rifle? The family owned anshuzt rifle was resting against a first floor box room window where it had been placed by Sheila at around 7.15am, onward! How had this rifle managed to find its way onto Sheila's body to enable the cops to stage her death scene as a suicide upstairs in the main bedroom? I am sorry I just don't get this ? That's why they got away with doing what they did, ordinary members of the public subscribe to the model of a police officer being law abiding, honest and specific, but in the vast majority of cases, they are the criminals in uniform, they lie, they fabricate, to try and protect themselves, and secure wrongful convictions against totally innocent people! They paraphrase witness statements of ordinary witnesses to try and show some intent on the defendants the part! They are bias, corrupt criminals in uniform, please try to remember ember that phrase, it account ta for what these low life scumbags in uniform represent! Trust these criminals in uniform at your own peril!


so when other officers got involved could they not tell them what they had done in respect of moving the bodies? it depends what you mean in the context of what your saying, or asking? I can answer you, but I need to be absolutely clear about what your saying, or asking me to comment on or about!
 


These answers can be expanded upon, if necessary!!
« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 02:52:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #382 on: July 19, 2017, 02:57:PM »
Cops in the so called Bamber case, encouraged by corrupt CPS officials fabricated the photographic evidence which convinced the jury that Sheila did not kill herself!

I agree with this conclusion she did not shoot or kill herself, the police shot her, they killed her, and they deliberately withheld and concealed a total of 358 crime scene photographs, and a crime scene video which proves cops shot Sheila and that cops staged her death scene on the main bedroom floor as a suicide!

The public needs to open their eyes to what these criminals in uniform get up to...

They are basically scumbags who should be hung at the gallows, horrible despicable individuals..
« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 02:59:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #383 on: July 19, 2017, 03:02:PM »
Cops in the so called Bamber case, encouraged by corrupt CPS officials fabricated the photographic evidence which convinced the jury that Sheila did not kill herself!

I agree with this conclusion she did not shoot or kill herself, the police shot her, they killed her, and they deliberately withheld and concealed a total of 358 crime scene photographs, and a crime scene video which proves cops shot Sheila and that cops staged her death scene on the main bedroom floor as a suicide!

The public needs to open their eyes to what these criminals in uniform get up to...

They are basically scumbags who should be hung at the gallows, horrible despicable individuals..

I personally would be prepared to be the official hangnan that hangs every last one of these evil,
vile bastards!!!

They create crimes, and can't even get it right in so doing!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #384 on: July 19, 2017, 03:03:PM »
These criminals in uniform, and their cousins at the CPS are the real criminals..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #385 on: July 19, 2017, 03:05:PM »
These criminals in uniform, and their cousins at the CPS are the real criminals..

Always remember, they can lie, they can fabricate, and none of these evil vile monsters will invariably ever be prosecuted - how can such activity be part and parcel of a fair criminal justice system?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #386 on: July 19, 2017, 05:26:PM »
These answers can be expanded upon, if necessary!!

What I meant by the last comment was , new officers called in . They discover various problems with how the scene and evidence had been handled so decided they would go ahead with pursuing Jeremy , could not the other officers say " don't go down that route we know it looks odd but it was us that moved the bodies and the bible and  Jeremy did not do it?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #387 on: July 19, 2017, 09:17:PM »
What I meant by the last comment was , new officers called in . They discover various problems with how the scene and evidence had been handled so decided they would go ahead with pursuing Jeremy , could not the other officers say " don't go down that route we know it looks odd but it was us that moved the bodies and the bible and  Jeremy did not do it?

No, it didn't pan out quite like that - the same core of criminals in uniform did not advertise the existence of the 358 other crime scene photographs which existed (581 in total) kept in an album, which is known as, 'THE SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICERS ALBUM', kept under lock and key in ACC Peter Simpsons office safe at Chelmsford police station! Nobody had access to these damning photographs (all 358 of them) only ACC 'Peter' Simpson, except for training purposes! The training I am talking about is with regards to how to carry out 'informatives', and change a crime scene, so that a staged scene can be reset and photographed and use these latter photographs to promote the suggestion that this was how the scene was found undisturbed! The truth is, cops used two different SOCO teams to record the various crime scenes inside the farmhouse at different stages of the proceedings, team one recorded the scene as found by 9am before senior officers started to perform 'informatives'. In particular, DC Oakey and DC Henderson (both SOCO from HQ) recorded the position of Sheila's body on the bed at a time when she was not in possession of the rifle, and she had only been shot once! They also photographed June Bambers body on the bed! They photographed a bible on Sheila's chest whilst she was laid on top of the bed, and they photographed the rifle which had been brought from the box room window into the main bedroom and placed it on the bed in-between the bodies of Sheila and June! Whilst this was happening or thereabouts, DS 'Stan' Jones and DC 'Mick' Clarke, arrived at the scene and saw the two bodies on top of the bed! By this stage Sheila had only got one bullet wound to her throat! The Bible was still on Sheila's chest! The aforementioned rifle was resting on the bed in-between the two bodies, then Jones and Clark left the farmhouse! After they left senior officers authorised the removal of the two bodies from the bed, onto the floor either side of the bed. June's body was placed near the bedroom door on the right of the bed as viewed from the foot of the bed! Sheila's body was moved onto the bedroom floor to the left of the bed! The real crux of the cover up rests between examination of the crime scene photographs taken by SOCO team one (Oakey and Henderson), versus the photographic evidence taken by SOCO team two (Bird, Cook, Davidson and Hammersley) in other words the 358 withheld photographs taken by SOCO team one, prior to, and during 'informatives'  photographs taken between 9am and 10 am, versus the 223+ photographs taken by SOCO team two, after senior officers had staged the bodies of Sheila, and June on the bedroom floor, photographed after 10 am. The evidence is there for all to see by anybody interested in looking! Obviously, brainwashed members of the public will refuse to recognise the truth in the matter! Cops are heroes every damn one of them! Of course they are...

New officers joining, or taking over in any new investigation were not privy to the measures taken involving the cover up of how Sheila Caffell died inside whf at precisely 9.13am on the main bedroom floor! Her death and the build up to it after firearm officers set off at 7.30am to enter the farmhouse, in the kitchen downstairs by 7.35am, then upstairs on the far side of the bed in the main bedroom by 8.44am, and on the main bedroom floor at 9.13am, proved to be an insurmountable exercise in police negligence, and dishonesty!

The cops thought they could get away with it because in presenting Sheila Caffells death as a suicide, they could take the case through the Coroner's court system, where only the cause of death needed to be established 'gunshot to the neck and head'! Once the nature of the investigation changed into five murders, police had taken the cover up too far already, there was no turning back! Photographs and a video of the crime scene taken by SOCO team one, were edited out and a false ' THE MASTER COPY ALBUM' was created so that any new officers joining the new investigation worked off the photographs that were taken after 10am by the second team of SOCO...


« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 09:51:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #388 on: July 19, 2017, 09:52:PM »
I have analysed all the available material, I know exactly what these criminals in uniform did, and how they did it!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The rifle in the window.
« Reply #389 on: July 19, 2017, 10:05:PM »
I was targeted after my release from HMP Full Sutton, on 26 July 1990 on bail pending an appeal to the Royal Courts of Justice, by the now defunct No. 3 Regional Crime Squad, and the equally despicable local South Yorkshire CPS! I was taking an active interest in Jeremy Bambers case, and beginning to expose dishonesty and corruption in the police and prosecutions case! I was eventually rearrested on 10 July 1991, at Goldthorpe in South Yorkshire, on suspicion of burgling a retired Judges house, at Peakley Hill, Derbyshire and stealing from therein, £25,000 in silverware! At my trial I was represented by Victor Temple, QC. Little did I know that he would be the lead prosecutor opposing Bambers 2002 appeal! Whilst representing me he questioned me about the role I was playing trying to help Jeremy Bamber, and what I had thus far discovered and uncovered! It seems obvious to me now with the benefit of hindsight that he should not have been questioning me about Jeremy Bambers case, and that he should not have opposed Bambers appeal, the CPS should have got somebody else to do that! There was a conflict of interest involving Victor Temple, QC in representing me, and opposing Jeremy Bambers 2002 appeal - this just highlights the extent of the corruption and dishonesty in the CPS...


« Last Edit: July 19, 2017, 10:27:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...