0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
"Paint sample. DS Davidson thinks it was taken because there was some red paint on the end of the barrel of the weapon which was found downstairs, which had a good knock. DS Davidson confirmed, the barrel, not the silencer"
"It was during the supposed struggle between Ralph and Jeremy that the barrel, the weapon, somehow caught the underside of the mantle during the struggle, that is how I recall it Sir. DS Davidson re-confirmed barrel, not the silencer".
Goodness me,what's been the point of all these mistakes ?
Must admit, there was an awful lot Lookout
The paint & blood were inside the silencer.
For those that are interested, the above extracts are taken from Davidson's COLP interview in 1991.The full document can be viewed here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,590.msg12022.html#msg12022Rather than the sensational title of this thread, it seems that Davidson wasn't involved in this aspect of the case and he is relying on memory. It appears that he is simply mistaken.
Thanks Hartley, I thought there would be something somewhere, I like to take a back seat, you only get accused if you post, pack of hyenas etc and I've had an exhausting morning doing nothing.
He is a SOC officer. I think he knows the difference between a barrell and a silencer - in a case in which the silencer was the main exhibit. He knows in advance that he's going to be interviewed. I'm hardly sensationalising the title of the thread!
I'll let people read the interview if they want to. The first time Davidson sees the silencer is the real killer - in 1991.
Half of them should have been put out to grass given their fading memories.
