From the original post "The Home Office appointed forensic scientists were, in effect, part of the prosecution team. They were not expected to demonstrate scientific impartiality. Their role was to use scientific arguments to bolster the prosecution case. They were paid by the government and they were expected to support the police, not undermine them. "
I must admit I did not realise this. Very interesting .
I was trying to read the statement after the trial which said that the forensic reports were not submitted until sept when ainsley took over?
Or did I misunderstand that?