0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What happened to the Sherpa van as well ? Wasn't that also JB's ? Was it examined ?Like everything else,if they didn't contain JB's DNA,etc,they weren't interested. Also the footprint around a window area ?
Wouldn't that incriminate him?
Why would it if it wasn't his ? Which it obviously wasn't,as that's why the " find " died a death,like everything else which was " found ".
How could they prove it was or wasn't his?
Who said the footprint was near a window? PS. I doubt JB would be barefooted in any situation envolving the murders.
One thing for sure,there was no sign of a mucky shoe/boot-print on entry and certainly no sign of a bloodied one on the way out-------not even inside the farmhouse considering there was a lot of blood in the kitchen, which even that hadn't been carried upstairs. Not a print in sight.
I certainly don't think he used the bike and that RWB had rather a vivid imagination. There wouldn't be prints if he used gloves but there were bloody prints found on the aga tiles, it's in CAL's book (although they were probably Nevill's).
The police believe he cycled to WHF. On the bike he brought over to his cottage just before the massacre. How did he get to & from WHF ?
There are such things as glove-prints.
I believe he walked. I make a similar walk twice a day with my dog across the fields. He knew the area well and would be familiar with short cuts and access routes.
