Experts/police/relatives creating a mountain of false forensic evidence:

[lookout]

4 million + pieces of evidence stating JB's innocence.

[Adam]

4 million + pieces of evidence stating JB's innocence.

Really ? Tell me more. Or are you just going to keep saying this whenever you can't answer a question ?

Do you believe professors, experts, blood testers, police officers, relatives all combined to create 50+ pieces of false documents, reports, WS's & court testimonies ?

[notsure]

Really ? Tell me more. Or are you just going to keep saying this whenever you can't answer a question ?

Do you believe professors, experts, blood testers, police officers, relatives all combined to create 50+ pieces of false documents, reports, WS's & court testimonies ?

You post the same bullshit over and over again and to be quite frank it's putting me off posting at all. You don't debate Adam, you just write lists saying the same thing again and again. You do it to antagonise
Not to debate seriously.

You aren't really interested in this case you are interested in having some kind of power where you can spout what you want and feel big about it.

Just go boil your head!

[lookout]

You post the same bullshit over and over again and to be quite frank it's putting me off posting at all. You don't debate Adam, you just write lists saying the same thing again and again. You do it to antagonise
Not to debate seriously.

You aren't really interested in this case you are interested in having some kind of power where you can spout what you want and feel big about it.

Just go boil your head!

Quite right too,notsure. I can see through him !

[Adam]

What cannot be disputed is everything in the list on page 1 has been released as forensic evidence. Over half is within the 522 points of the 2002 Court of Appeal.

The options are then -

1:

Each piece of released forènsic evidence is wrong through innocent human error. 


2:

Each piece of released forensic evidence is wrong due to unprecedented huge scale deliberate falseification from hundreds of experts, professors,  police officers & relatives. 


3:

Bamber is guilty and each piece of released forensic evidence is correct.


4:

Bamber is guilty. However after 32 years a small amount of the released forensic evidence may be open to challenge due to human error or individual interppretation.

                                            ____________

I'm sure everyone will rule out option 1. One piece of forensic evidence may be wrong due to human error. But not over 50 pieces.

So far no one has supported option 2.

Option 3 & 4 are the most plausible and show 100% that Bamber is guilty. Unless people say RB, AE, a random stranger, hit man or SAS style hit man team committed the massacre, as suggested by Mike & Sherlock.

[lookout]

Crispy was quite a versatile animal,jumping up putting switches on and off,then opening and closing curtains. He also leapt up and down in front of the window giving everyone the impression that there was someone looking out at Jeremy and the police.
After disabling the phone it ran upstairs and shot Sheila. 

[Adam]

Crispy was quite a versatile animal,jumping up putting switches on and off,then opening and closing curtains. He also leapt up and down in front of the window giving everyone the impression that there was someone looking out at Jeremy and the police.
After disabling the phone it ran upstairs and shot Sheila.

So Nevill rang Bamber and actually said "Crispy's gone crazy and he's got the gun".

[mike tesko]

What cannot be disputed is everything in the list on page 1 has been released as forensic evidence. Over half is within the 522 points of the 2002 Court of Appeal. Why are you insisting on what was said in the 2002 appeal judgement as they are god, all knowing, truthful and merciful? Unless you have e erbeen a victim or a benefit iary in an appeal, you can't begin to understand how corrupted the court of appeal itself can be? Iris a well known fact that certain judges in the appeal court are bias in favour of the prosecutions case,
or and police evidence! The lucifarian authorities can make sure a particular case is heard on appeal, by one or more of these bias individuals! The CPS and the prosecution are experts at delaying an appeal, or bringing an appeal forward so that the case is heard by one of their own, a lucifarian!

The options are then -

1:

Each piece of released forènsic evidence is wrong through innocent human error.  depends what your referring g to, or relying on?


2:

Each piece of released forensic evidence is wrong due to unprecedented huge scale deliberate falseification from hundreds of experts, professors,  police officers & relatives. no, it's not, stop exaggerations g things, it only takes one corrupt person to fabricate a piece of evidence, the rest follow on acting as though it's true, and has integrity! Stop making it into something it's not...

3:

Bamber is guilty and each piece of released forensic evidence is correct. Wrong, Bamber is innocent, he could not have shot his sister dead in the kitchen at 7.30am, with use of the anshuzt rifle which from 7.15am, onward was resting against a first floor box room window! He could not have staged his sisters body downstairs in the kitchen so that lucifarian cops were calling her death in the kitchen by 7.45am, as a suicide! Worse still, how could he then also shoot his sister a second time upstairs on the main bedroom floor by the very same rifle in another room, and stage her death scene there on the main bedroom floor,carter two cops (Jones and Clark) had seen the bodies of Sheila and June laid on top of the bed in the main bedroom with the rifle on the bed between both bodies!


4:

Bamber is guilty He has been found guilty, but he is clearly innocent! . However after 32 years a small amount of the released forensic evidence may be open to challenge due to human error or individual interppretation. You forgot to mention that key evidence relating to the two different phone calls was deliberately withheld from e erybody, by the lucifarian authorities!  If the contents of both logs had been disclosed along with the claim that there was a simple mix up regarding the time of Jeremy's call,
we would not be here now, debating the matter!

                                            ____________

I'm sure everyone will rule out option 1. One piece of forensic evidence may be wrong due to human error. But not over 50 pieces.

So far no one has supported option 2.

Option 3 & 4 are the most plausible and show 100% that Bamber is guilty. Unless people say RB, AE, a random stranger, hit man or SAS style hit man team committed the massacre, as suggested by Mike
the gist of which supports the case for a third party involvement in the shooting and death of Sheila Caffell, contrary to the mocking insinuation provided by the trial judge in his summing up, where he badly told the jury, that the killer was either Sheila or Jeremy, there was no third party involvement! & Sherlock.

[David1819]

Perfectly clean feet.

Feet free from blood staining.

No debris such as sugar on feet

[Steve_uk]

That's not Sheila's foot.

[David1819]

No presence of firearm residue on nightdress
 

[David1819]

No blood in the rifle end.

[David1819]

Sheila's legs pulled after second shot.

Sheila's blood underneath the bible.

[David1819]

Effects of Haloperidol.

Sheila having Haloperidol in her body.

Sheila's condition hours before the massacre.

Sheila under sedation.

[David1819]

Professor Herbert Leon Mcdonell.