Author Topic: Experts/police/relatives creating a mountain of false forensic evidence:  (Read 603 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 35033
4 million + pieces of evidence stating JB's innocence.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18189
4 million + pieces of evidence stating JB's innocence.

Really ? Tell me more. Or are you just going to keep saying this whenever you can't answer a question ?

Do you believe professors, experts, blood testers, police officers, relatives all combined to create 50+ pieces of false documents, reports, WS's & court testimonies ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1360
Really ? Tell me more. Or are you just going to keep saying this whenever you can't answer a question ?

Do you believe professors, experts, blood testers, police officers, relatives all combined to create 50+ pieces of false documents, reports, WS's & court testimonies ?

You post the same bullshit over and over again and to be quite frank it's putting me off posting at all. You don't debate Adam, you just write lists saying the same thing again and again. You do it to antagonise
Not to debate seriously.

You aren't really interested in this case you are interested in having some kind of power where you can spout what you want and feel big about it.

Just go boil your head!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 35033
You post the same bullshit over and over again and to be quite frank it's putting me off posting at all. You don't debate Adam, you just write lists saying the same thing again and again. You do it to antagonise
Not to debate seriously.

You aren't really interested in this case you are interested in having some kind of power where you can spout what you want and feel big about it.

Just go boil your head!





Quite right too,notsure. I can see through him !

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18189
What cannot be disputed is everything in the list on page 1 has been released as forensic evidence. Over half is within the 522 points of the 2002 Court of Appeal.

The options are then -

1:

Each piece of released forènsic evidence is wrong through innocent human error. 


2:

Each piece of released forensic evidence is wrong due to unprecedented huge scale deliberate falseification from hundreds of experts, professors,  police officers & relatives. 


3:

Bamber is guilty and each piece of released forensic evidence is correct.


4:

Bamber is guilty. However after 32 years a small amount of the released forensic evidence may be open to challenge due to human error or individual interppretation.

                                            ____________

I'm sure everyone will rule out option 1. One piece of forensic evidence may be wrong due to human error. But not over 50 pieces.

So far no one has supported option 2.

Option 3 & 4 are the most plausible and show 100% that Bamber is guilty. Unless people say RB, AE, a random stranger, hit man or SAS style hit man team committed the massacre, as suggested by Mike & Sherlock.

« Last Edit: June 11, 2017, 04:11:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 35033
Crispy was quite a versatile animal,jumping up putting switches on and off,then opening and closing curtains. He also leapt up and down in front of the window giving everyone the impression that there was someone looking out at Jeremy and the police.
After disabling the phone it ran upstairs and shot Sheila. 

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18189
Crispy was quite a versatile animal,jumping up putting switches on and off,then opening and closing curtains. He also leapt up and down in front of the window giving everyone the impression that there was someone looking out at Jeremy and the police.
After disabling the phone it ran upstairs and shot Sheila.

So Nevill rang Bamber and actually said "Crispy's gone crazy and he's got the gun".
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39043
What cannot be disputed is everything in the list on page 1 has been released as forensic evidence. Over half is within the 522 points of the 2002 Court of Appeal. Why are you insisting on what was said in the 2002 appeal judgement as they are god, all knowing, truthful and merciful? Unless you have e erbeen a victim or a benefit iary in an appeal, you can't begin to understand how corrupted the court of appeal itself can be? Iris a well known fact that certain judges in the appeal court are bias in favour of the prosecutions case,
or and police evidence! The lucifarian authorities can make sure a particular case is heard on appeal, by one or more of these bias individuals! The CPS and the prosecution are experts at delaying an appeal, or bringing an appeal forward so that the case is heard by one of their own, a lucifarian!


The options are then -

1:

Each piece of released forènsic evidence is wrong through innocent human error.  depends what your referring g to, or relying on?


2:

Each piece of released forensic evidence is wrong due to unprecedented huge scale deliberate falseification from hundreds of experts, professors,  police officers & relatives. no, it's not, stop exaggerations g things, it only takes one corrupt person to fabricate a piece of evidence, the rest follow on acting as though it's true, and has integrity! Stop making it into something it's not...

3:

Bamber is guilty and each piece of released forensic evidence is correct. Wrong, Bamber is innocent, he could not have shot his sister dead in the kitchen at 7.30am, with use of the anshuzt rifle which from 7.15am, onward was resting against a first floor box room window! He could not have staged his sisters body downstairs in the kitchen so that lucifarian cops were calling her death in the kitchen by 7.45am, as a suicide! Worse still, how could he then also shoot his sister a second time upstairs on the main bedroom floor by the very same rifle in another room, and stage her death scene there on the main bedroom floor,carter two cops (Jones and Clark) had seen the bodies of Sheila and June laid on top of the bed in the main bedroom with the rifle on the bed between both bodies!


4:

Bamber is guilty He has been found guilty, but he is clearly innocent! . However after 32 years a small amount of the released forensic evidence may be open to challenge due to human error or individual interppretation. You forgot to mention that key evidence relating to the two different phone calls was deliberately withheld from e erybody, by the lucifarian authorities!  If the contents of both logs had been disclosed along with the claim that there was a simple mix up regarding the time of Jeremy's call,
we would not be here now, debating the matter!


                                            ____________

I'm sure everyone will rule out option 1. One piece of forensic evidence may be wrong due to human error. But not over 50 pieces.

So far no one has supported option 2.

Option 3 & 4 are the most plausible and show 100% that Bamber is guilty. Unless people say RB, AE, a random stranger, hit man or SAS style hit man team committed the massacre, as suggested by Mike
the gist of which supports the case for a third party involvement in the shooting and death of Sheila Caffell, contrary to the mocking insinuation provided by the trial judge in his summing up, where he badly told the jury, that the killer was either Sheila or Jeremy, there was no third party involvement!
& Sherlock.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2017, 09:29:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
Perfectly clean feet.

Feet free from blood staining.

No debris such as sugar on feet


"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline Steve_uk

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8873

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668

No presence of firearm residue on nightdress
 

"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668

Sheila's legs pulled after second shot.

Sheila's blood underneath the bible.

"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
Effects of Haloperidol.

Sheila having Haloperidol in her body.

Sheila's condition hours before the massacre.

Sheila under sedation.


"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."