Author Topic: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight  (Read 9928 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ralph

  • Guest
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #405 on: December 03, 2017, 11:24:AM »
beldeild also promised to give a dna sample but then funnly enough dident do it.

so ill take his cliam that he would take a polgraph yest with a hefty pinch of salt.
Well anyone who isn’t willing to take up the challenge must be guilty and a jury would find them guilty in your world  ;D ;D ;D

ralph

  • Guest
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #406 on: December 03, 2017, 11:41:AM »
I don't think it does, really - Josie had already seen him in an ID parade and didn't pick him out, her description of the man's height and build didn't match and, like I said previously, the story accompanying the picture was about Michael Stone being found guilty, so very leading.

I read another article claiming that Shaun Russell has always had  niggling doubts about the conviction and said if he'd been on the jury, he'd probably have been one of the two against returning a guilty verdict. I'll see if I can find the link and post it later - I need to fix my washing machine for now.
I think it’s a case of which one you believe is making things up at the moment, we are all reading articles in which, Stone says one thing and Bellifield says another, giving it to the press to print only hurts Josie more I would think, myself I really don’t know, but I don’t buy into the fact that Nugnug said, a jury would find you guilty if you refused to take a DNA sample from a Lawers request, or it proves your guilt if you don’t take a test if a Lawer demands it.  Complete and utter rubbish!

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13971
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #407 on: December 03, 2017, 12:12:PM »
I think it’s a case of which one you believe is making things up at the moment, we are all reading articles in which, Stone says one thing and Bellifield says another, giving it to the press to print only hurts Josie more I would think, myself I really don’t know, but I don’t buy into the fact that Nugnug said, a jury would find you guilty if you refused to take a DNA sample from a Lawers request, or it proves your guilt if you don’t take a test if a Lawer demands it.  Complete and utter rubbish!

everybody is acusing of killing children a simple test would prove the acusation false surely an innocent man who does not want to be labeled a child killer will want the test done as soon as possble to clear there name.

ralph

  • Guest
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #408 on: December 03, 2017, 01:15:PM »
everybody is acusing of killing children a simple test would prove the acusation false surely an innocent man who does not want to be labeled a child killer will want the test done as soon as possble to clear there name.
I think killing an innocent 13 year old Child called Milly is enough anyway to be classed as such?

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13971
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #409 on: December 03, 2017, 01:40:PM »
I think killing an innocent 13 year old Child called Milly is enough anyway to be classed as such?

but hes still trying to appeal that.

ralph

  • Guest
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #410 on: December 03, 2017, 02:08:PM »
but hes still trying to appeal that.
That still doesn’t alter the fact he’s in there for killing a child as well, fellow  prisoners will now look on him as child killer, I don’t think many fellow prisoners would fall for him saying he hadn’t killed her anyway considering what he has done in the past.  I bet to be honest no one would be surprised if it wasn’t him who did the Lin Russel murders, to me it didnt look like a Bellfield type murder?  Who knows, but I don’t think it’s fair to put the blame on him for that on the evidence you suggested that he wouldn’t take a DNA test so he must be guilty, or a jury would find him guilty rubbish

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3078
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #411 on: December 03, 2017, 02:26:PM »
That still doesn’t alter the fact he’s in there for killing a child as well, fellow  prisoners will now look on him as child killer, I don’t think many fellow prisoners would fall for him saying he hadn’t killed her anyway considering what he has done in the past.  I bet to be honest no one would be surprised if it wasn’t him who did the Lin Russel murders, to me it didnt look like a Bellfield type murder?  Who knows, but I don’t think it’s fair to put the blame on him for that on the evidence you suggested that he wouldn’t take a DNA test so he must be guilty, or a jury would find him guilty rubbish
good post justice totally agree.also lets wait and see the outcome.one is a convicter killer the other if innocent will soon commit some violent crime and join him in the nick

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13971
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #412 on: December 03, 2017, 02:49:PM »
That still doesn’t alter the fact he’s in there for killing a child as well, fellow  prisoners will now look on him as child killer, I don’t think many fellow prisoners would fall for him saying he hadn’t killed her anyway considering what he has done in the past.  I bet to be honest no one would be surprised if it wasn’t him who did the Lin Russel murders, to me it didnt look like a Bellfield type murder?  Who knows, but I don’t think it’s fair to put the blame on him for that on the evidence you suggested that he wouldn’t take a DNA test so he must be guilty, or a jury would find him guilty rubbish

but at first he said he would be happy to take a dna test why did he change his mind.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10622
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #413 on: December 03, 2017, 02:56:PM »
but at first he said he would be happy to take a dna test why did he change his mind.
Maybe he likes the notoriety of being associated with the crime, or of keeping the public guessing. Remember there's no DNA to link Stone to the crime, which must give credence to his innocence plea.

ralph

  • Guest
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #414 on: December 03, 2017, 02:57:PM »
but at first he said he would be happy to take a dna test why did he change his mind.
Probably his Lawyers told him to admit and agree to nothing, who knows, what amazes me, when something is put out about Stone refusing, it’s hearsay paper talk, when it’s about Bellfield it’s gospel.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2017, 03:01:PM by justice »

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13971
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #415 on: December 03, 2017, 03:20:PM »
Probably his Lawyers told him to admit and agree to nothing, who knows, what amazes me, when something is put out about Stone refusing, it’s hearsay paper talk, when it’s about Bellfield it’s gospel.

stones dna was already tested when he was chardged with the murders it was established athe time that the dna wasn't his.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13971
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #416 on: December 08, 2017, 04:52:PM »
Maybe he likes the notoriety of being associated with the crime, or of keeping the public guessing. Remember there's no DNA to link Stone to the crime, which must give credence to his innocence plea.

well i suppose that could be the case no rather strange that the police wont insist on him giving a sample though i mean who else gets that chioce.

Offline Nigel

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1197
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #417 on: May 14, 2018, 08:38:PM »
The youtube video of the documentary has been removed.

Part 1 and Part 2 can be re-watched here:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5ohn1r
I slow down for a speeding police car, don't you?

6.01pm on Friday 6th September 1985 'Part 2' of the case began.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13971
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #418 on: May 15, 2018, 05:03:PM »
i havent heard anymore about this lie detecter the belfeild is supposed to be taking.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6080
Re: Michael Stone New Evidence Tonight
« Reply #419 on: May 15, 2018, 10:38:PM »
They convicted this guy twice based on nothing.
"Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

"The idea that he could invent a tale of a killing spree by a mentally disturbed woman to be lent credibility by further violent episodes over the following decades is hard to credit."