0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Maybe, he thinks if he can get off with that one, he won't be classed as a serial killer? I think I've read that three separate killings are classed as a serial killer, that might be in America though and it might be two in this country?
hes allready got a whole life tarrif for those killings so even if he wins this he wont be any better off.
belfield refused a dna test I cant see that any more proof of his guilt is needed innocent people don't do that.
You can’t convict and say someone is guilty because they won’t do a dna test, plenty of women want me to do one but they can sod off!
I'm most jurys would find you guilty if they knew you had refused.
How could they, I’ve had one of those vasectomy things